High-intensity interval training after stroke: A mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis of safety, feasibility and acceptability

ObjectiveTo synthesise evidence regarding the safety, feasibility and acceptability of high-intensity interval training in adults post-stroke.Data sourcesA systematic literature search using eight major databases from inception to January 2025.Review methodsStudies of any design, involving adults post-stroke, reporting on safety, feasibility and/or acceptability of any type of high-intensity interval training, were eligible. Methodological quality was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project or the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, as appropriate. Meta-analyses of adverse events and dropouts were undertaken on data from randomised controlled trials. GRADE methodology was used to categorise the level of certainty of the evidence from each meta-analysis.ResultsTwenty studies plus one follow-up and a cost analysis, involving 658 participants, were included. Methodological quality varied. High-intensity interval training was mainly conducted individually and in supervised settings. There were no fatalities related to high-intensity interval training. There was low-moderate certainty of no difference in the risk of adverse events, whether these were intervention-related, non-intervention related or unclear. Average attendance at high-intensity interval training sessions was 94.4%. Reporting on acceptability of high-intensity interval training was scarce, but where reported participants' experiences were generally favourable.ConclusionThis systematic review found low-moderate certainty evidence that high-intensity interval training can be safe and feasible for carefully selected, generally younger, mildly affected, male stroke survivors in the chronic stage, supervised by trained professionals in controlled settings. Future studies should investigate experiences of high-intensity interval training and explore its use in a wider stroke population and range of settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Rehabilitation
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251385222
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High-intensity interval training after stroke: A mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis of safety, feasibility and acceptability

Frederike van Wijck, Lorna Paul, Hugo Blatgé
Clinical Rehabilitation
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

High-intensity interval training after stroke: A mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis of safety, feasibility and acceptability

Frederike van Wijck, Lorna Paul, Hugo Blatgé
article en

Abstract

ObjectiveTo synthesise evidence regarding the safety, feasibility and acceptability of high-intensity interval training in adults post-stroke.Data sourcesA systematic literature search using eight major databases from inception to January 2025.Review methodsStudies of any design, involving adults post-stroke, reporting on safety, feasibility and/or acceptability of any type of high-intensity interval training, were eligible. Methodological quality was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project or the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, as appropriate. Meta-analyses of adverse events and dropouts were undertaken on data from randomised controlled trials. GRADE methodology was used to categorise the level of certainty of the evidence from each meta-analysis.ResultsTwenty studies plus one follow-up and a cost analysis, involving 658 participants, were included. Methodological quality varied. High-intensity interval training was mainly conducted individually and in supervised settings. There were no fatalities related to high-intensity interval training. There was low-moderate certainty of no difference in the risk of adverse events, whether these were intervention-related, non-intervention related or unclear. Average attendance at high-intensity interval training sessions was 94.4%. Reporting on acceptability of high-intensity interval training was scarce, but where reported participants' experiences were generally favourable.ConclusionThis systematic review found low-moderate certainty evidence that high-intensity interval training can be safe and feasible for carefully selected, generally younger, mildly affected, male stroke survivors in the chronic stage, supervised by trained professionals in controlled settings. Future studies should investigate experiences of high-intensity interval training and explore its use in a wider stroke population and range of settings.

Clinical RehabilitationVol. 40(3)
Glasgow Caledonian University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.