Practice Research Collaboratives: Promising Communities of Research?

Purpose: This article reflects an analysis of the establishment and development of the Practice Research Collaborative on Organizational Supports (PRC-OS) within the International Community of Practice Research. The basic thesis concerns the importance of building intersecting special interest groups to form communities of research practice. Methods: The study is a qualitative case study, consisting of diverse data as written documents, field notes, and participative observation. A thematic and abductive analysis was conducted. Results: Sharing of practices and knowledge, values and ethos are important factors to develop the PRC-OS, as is also negotiations on participation and organization. These themes are intertwined and must be considered important factors that need continuous attention and negotiation in order for the collaborative to sustain and thrive. Discussion: Contextualized within theories on communities of practice, the PRC-OS facilitates for a trialogical learning process and it develops in cyclical phases of commitment, start-up, and operating.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research on Social Work Practice
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315251392535
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Participatory Visual Research Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practice Research Collaboratives: Promising Communities of Research?

Marianne Wyder, Heidi Muurinen, Bowen McBeath, Sidsel Natland et al.
1 citations
Research on Social Work Practice
Participatory Visual Research Methods
4.20
article

Practice Research Collaboratives: Promising Communities of Research?

Marianne Wyder, Heidi Muurinen, Bowen McBeath, Sidsel Natland, Michael J. Austin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose: This article reflects an analysis of the establishment and development of the Practice Research Collaborative on Organizational Supports (PRC-OS) within the International Community of Practice Research. The basic thesis concerns the importance of building intersecting special interest groups to form communities of research practice. Methods: The study is a qualitative case study, consisting of diverse data as written documents, field notes, and participative observation. A thematic and abductive analysis was conducted. Results: Sharing of practices and knowledge, values and ethos are important factors to develop the PRC-OS, as is also negotiations on participation and organization. These themes are intertwined and must be considered important factors that need continuous attention and negotiation in order for the collaborative to sustain and thrive. Discussion: Contextualized within theories on communities of practice, the PRC-OS facilitates for a trialogical learning process and it develops in cyclical phases of commitment, start-up, and operating.

Research on Social Work Practice
Portland State University (US), OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO), Mental Health Services (DK), Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (FI), FrontLine Service (US), Metro South Health (AU), Metropolitan University (BD), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Participatory Visual Research Methods
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.