Reproductive Autonomy Restrictions as Collective Violence

In this essay, we argue that policies that intentionally or unintentionally restrict reproductive autonomy constitute an act of violence. First, we discuss our guiding framework, highlighting the intersections between reproductive autonomy, reproductive justice, and violence. Second, we describe the importance of framing the restriction of reproductive autonomy as violence, emphasizing potential implications. Finally, we provide 3 illustrative examples of how governmental power-through the passage of laws-can both support and constrain reproductive autonomy across the life course: sex education, abortion restrictions, and parental leave policies. For each, we explain how the consequent harms overlap with those resulting from more traditional overt forms of violence. By framing the loss of reproductive autonomy as a form of violence, we underscore its profound and far-reaching harms, demanding urgent recognition and response as a critical public health and human rights issue. (<i>Am J Public Health</i>. 2026;116(3):329-336. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2025.308276).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2025.308276
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reproductive Autonomy Restrictions as Collective Violence

Kriszta Farkas, Krista Neumann, Molly R. Altman, N. Jeanie Santaularia et al.
American Journal of Public Health
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

Reproductive Autonomy Restrictions as Collective Violence

Kriszta Farkas, Krista Neumann, Molly R. Altman, N. Jeanie Santaularia, Maryam Tanveer
article en

Abstract

In this essay, we argue that policies that intentionally or unintentionally restrict reproductive autonomy constitute an act of violence. First, we discuss our guiding framework, highlighting the intersections between reproductive autonomy, reproductive justice, and violence. Second, we describe the importance of framing the restriction of reproductive autonomy as violence, emphasizing potential implications. Finally, we provide 3 illustrative examples of how governmental power-through the passage of laws-can both support and constrain reproductive autonomy across the life course: sex education, abortion restrictions, and parental leave policies. For each, we explain how the consequent harms overlap with those resulting from more traditional overt forms of violence. By framing the loss of reproductive autonomy as a form of violence, we underscore its profound and far-reaching harms, demanding urgent recognition and response as a critical public health and human rights issue. (<i>Am J Public Health</i>. 2026;116(3):329-336. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2025.308276).

American Journal of Public HealthVol. 116(3)
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US), University of Washington (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.