Is a 1D perturbative method sufficient for asteroseismic modelling of <i>β</i> Cephei pulsators?

Context. Asymmetries in the observed rotational splittings of a multiplet contain information about the star’s rotation profile and internal magnetic field. Moreover, the frequency regularities of multiplets can be used for mode identification. However, to exploit this information, highly accurate theoretical predictions are needed. Aims. We aim to quantify the difference in the predicted mode asymmetries between a 1D perturbative method and a 2D method that includes a 2D stellar structure model, which takes rotation into account. We then place these differences between 1D and 2D methods in the context of asteroseismic measurements of internal magnetic fields. We only focus on the asymmetries and not on possible additional frequency peaks that can arise when the magnetic and rotation axis are misaligned. Methods. We coupled the 1D pulsation codes GYRE and StORM to the 2D stellar structure code ESTER and compared the oscillation predictions with the results from the 2D TOP pulsation code. We focused on zero-age main-sequence models representative of rotating β Cephei pulsators spinning at up to 20 per cent of the critical Keplerian rotation rate. Specifically, we investigated low-radial-order gravity and pressure modes. Results. We find a generally good agreement between the oscillation frequencies resulting from the 1D and 2D pulsation codes. We report differences in predicted mode multiplet asymmetries of mostly below 0.06 d −1 . Since the magnetic asymmetries are small compared to the differences in the rotational asymmetries resulting from the 1D and 2D predictions, accurate measurements of the magnetic field are in most cases challenging. Conclusions. Differences in the predicted mode asymmetries of a rotating star between 1D perturbative methods and 2D non-perturbative methods can greatly hinder accurate measurements of internal magnetic fields in main-sequence pulsators with low-order modes. Nevertheless, reasonably accurate measurements could be possible with n pg ≥ 2 modes if the internal rotation is roughly below 10 per cent of the Keplerian critical rotation frequency for (aligned) magnetic fields of the order of a few hundred kilogauss. While the differences between the 1D and 2D frequency predictions are mostly too large for internal magnetic field detections, the rotational asymmetries predicted by StORM are in general accurate enough for asteroseismic modelling of the stellar rotation in main-sequence stars with identified low-order modes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202557247
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is a 1D perturbative method sufficient for asteroseismic modelling of β Cephei pulsators?

Vincent Vanlaer, D. R. Reese, M. Rieutord, S. Mathis et al.
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
article

Is a 1D perturbative method sufficient for asteroseismic modelling of β Cephei pulsators?

Vincent Vanlaer, D. R. Reese, M. Rieutord, S. Mathis, C. Aerts, L. Bugnet, J. Ballot, Joey S. G. Mombarg, S. Das
article en

Abstract

Context. Asymmetries in the observed rotational splittings of a multiplet contain information about the star’s rotation profile and internal magnetic field. Moreover, the frequency regularities of multiplets can be used for mode identification. However, to exploit this information, highly accurate theoretical predictions are needed. Aims. We aim to quantify the difference in the predicted mode asymmetries between a 1D perturbative method and a 2D method that includes a 2D stellar structure model, which takes rotation into account. We then place these differences between 1D and 2D methods in the context of asteroseismic measurements of internal magnetic fields. We only focus on the asymmetries and not on possible additional frequency peaks that can arise when the magnetic and rotation axis are misaligned. Methods. We coupled the 1D pulsation codes GYRE and StORM to the 2D stellar structure code ESTER and compared the oscillation predictions with the results from the 2D TOP pulsation code. We focused on zero-age main-sequence models representative of rotating β Cephei pulsators spinning at up to 20 per cent of the critical Keplerian rotation rate. Specifically, we investigated low-radial-order gravity and pressure modes. Results. We find a generally good agreement between the oscillation frequencies resulting from the 1D and 2D pulsation codes. We report differences in predicted mode multiplet asymmetries of mostly below 0.06 d −1 . Since the magnetic asymmetries are small compared to the differences in the rotational asymmetries resulting from the 1D and 2D predictions, accurate measurements of the magnetic field are in most cases challenging. Conclusions. Differences in the predicted mode asymmetries of a rotating star between 1D perturbative methods and 2D non-perturbative methods can greatly hinder accurate measurements of internal magnetic fields in main-sequence pulsators with low-order modes. Nevertheless, reasonably accurate measurements could be possible with n pg ≥ 2 modes if the internal rotation is roughly below 10 per cent of the Keplerian critical rotation frequency for (aligned) magnetic fields of the order of a few hundred kilogauss. While the differences between the 1D and 2D frequency predictions are mostly too large for internal magnetic field detections, the rotational asymmetries predicted by StORM are in general accurate enough for asteroseismic modelling of the stellar rotation in main-sequence stars with identified low-order modes.

Astronomy and AstrophysicsVol. 704
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Institute of Science and Technology Austria (AT), Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Astrophysique, Instrumentation et Modélisation (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Max Planck Institute for Astronomy (DE), Institute of Astronomy (RU), Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US), CEA Paris-Saclay (FR), KU Leuven (BE)
European Commission, Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Vlaamse regering, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.