Building a continuous benchmarking ecosystem in bioinformatics

Benchmarking, which involves collecting reference datasets and demonstrating method performance, is a requirement for the development of new computational tools, but also becomes a domain of its own to achieve neutral comparisons of methods. Although a lot has been written about how to design and conduct benchmark studies, this Perspective sheds light on a wish list for a computational platform to orchestrate benchmark studies. We discuss various ideas for organizing reproducible software environments, formally defining benchmarks, orchestrating standardized workflows, and how they interface with computing infrastructure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS Computational Biology
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013658
Primary Topic
Scientific Computing and Data Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building a continuous benchmarking ecosystem in bioinformatics

Charlotte Soneson, Almut Lütge, Izaskun Mallona, Mark D. Robinson et al.
PLoS Computational Biology
Scientific Computing and Data Management
article

Building a continuous benchmarking ecosystem in bioinformatics

Charlotte Soneson, Almut Lütge, Izaskun Mallona, Mark D. Robinson, Reto Gerber, Brian Carrillo, Anthony Sonrel, Daniel Incicau
article en

Abstract

Benchmarking, which involves collecting reference datasets and demonstrating method performance, is a requirement for the development of new computational tools, but also becomes a domain of its own to achieve neutral comparisons of methods. Although a lot has been written about how to design and conduct benchmark studies, this Perspective sheds light on a wish list for a computational platform to orchestrate benchmark studies. We discuss various ideas for organizing reproducible software environments, formally defining benchmarks, orchestrating standardized workflows, and how they interface with computing infrastructure.

PLoS Computational BiologyVol. 21(11)
SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (CH), University of Zurich (CH), Swiss Data Science Center (CH), Friedrich Miescher Institute (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Scientific Computing and Data Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.