Performance of geosynthetic-encased stone column groups in soft clay: field tests and numerical study

Ground improvement is essential when constructing on soft soils with low shear strength. While ordinary stone columns (OSCs) are commonly used, their effectiveness is limited in very soft soils due to inadequate lateral confining support. This is due to a lack of lateral support. Geosynthetic-encased stone columns (GESCs) provide additional lateral support and improve load-bearing capacity. This study compares GESCs and OSCs in a soft clay layer. Field load tests were conducted in Kurimamachi Yachō, Mie Prefecture, Japan. Numerical simulations were validated using PLAXIS 3D (v22). Instruments like earth pressure cells (EPCs) and piezometers measured stress distribution and excess pore water pressure (EPWP). Results showed OSCs had lower EPWP at low stress but higher EPWP at high loads due to clogging. In contrast, GESCs showed greater stress concentration with larger area replacement ratios. The critical column length for maximum bearing capacity was about 6.67 times the column diameter. A predictive model and design charts were created to match published test results. This will help engineers optimize GESC-improved ground design in construction projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geosynthetics International
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.25.00094
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of geosynthetic-encased stone column groups in soft clay: field tests and numerical study

Abdul Rahman, Nibir Rahman, Md. Rokonuzzaman, Toshinori Sakai
1 citations
Geosynthetics International
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
0.95
article

Performance of geosynthetic-encased stone column groups in soft clay: field tests and numerical study

Abdul Rahman, Nibir Rahman, Md. Rokonuzzaman, Toshinori Sakai
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Ground improvement is essential when constructing on soft soils with low shear strength. While ordinary stone columns (OSCs) are commonly used, their effectiveness is limited in very soft soils due to inadequate lateral confining support. This is due to a lack of lateral support. Geosynthetic-encased stone columns (GESCs) provide additional lateral support and improve load-bearing capacity. This study compares GESCs and OSCs in a soft clay layer. Field load tests were conducted in Kurimamachi Yachō, Mie Prefecture, Japan. Numerical simulations were validated using PLAXIS 3D (v22). Instruments like earth pressure cells (EPCs) and piezometers measured stress distribution and excess pore water pressure (EPWP). Results showed OSCs had lower EPWP at low stress but higher EPWP at high loads due to clogging. In contrast, GESCs showed greater stress concentration with larger area replacement ratios. The critical column length for maximum bearing capacity was about 6.67 times the column diameter. A predictive model and design charts were created to match published test results. This will help engineers optimize GESC-improved ground design in construction projects.

Geosynthetics International
Khulna University of Engineering and Technology (BD), Mie University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.