Does digital transformation reduce proactive risk-taking in banks? Evidence from risk governance mechanisms in China

Purpose This study examines how digital transformation influences proactive risk-taking behavior in commercial banks. This study aims to determine whether digitalization functions as a governance-enhancing capability that improves banks’ risk identification and capital allocation efficiency, thereby reducing their exposure to risk-weighted assets. Design/methodology/approach Using panel data on 138 Chinese commercial banks from 2010 to 2023, this study constructs a comprehensive digital transformation index based on the Peking University DTI and applies fixed-effects, instrumental-variable and matching estimations (propensity score matching and entropy balancing) to identify the causal impact of digitalization on banks’ risk-taking. Findings The empirical results demonstrate that digital transformation significantly reduces the proportion of risk-weighted assets (RWAR), indicating improved control over banks’ overall risk exposure. The mechanism analysis identifies two key internal governance channels – enhanced risk recognition and more efficient capital allocation – through which digitalization indirectly mitigates proactive risk-taking. Research limitations/implications This study is limited to Chinese banks and may not fully capture cross-country institutional differences. Future research can expand on multi-country panel comparisons to generalize findings. The endogenous nature of digitalization remains a challenge despite robust identification strategies. Practical implications The findings of this study underscore the importance of developing artificial intelligence-driven risk governance platforms. Regulators are encouraged to design digital policy incentives that account for regional and institutional heterogeneity. Meanwhile, banks should incorporate digital tools into their compliance oversight and capital planning processes. Social implications Enhancing digital governance in banking contributes to financial stability, mitigates capital misallocation and fosters sustainable growth in emerging markets. Strategically targeted digital transformation can help reduce regional disparities in banking system resilience. Originality/value This paper introduces the concept of digital risk governance mechanisms and reframes the digital–finance nexus through the lens of risk governance theory. This study contributes to the literature on technology-enabled financial regulation and offers actionable insights for emerging markets aiming to develop resilient, technology-driven frameworks for capital optimization and supervisory compliance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jfrc-05-2025-0140
Citations
2
Primary Topic
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does digital transformation reduce proactive risk-taking in banks? Evidence from risk governance mechanisms in China

Yuanjia Li
2 citations
Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
4.57
article

Does digital transformation reduce proactive risk-taking in banks? Evidence from risk governance mechanisms in China

Yuanjia Li
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study examines how digital transformation influences proactive risk-taking behavior in commercial banks. This study aims to determine whether digitalization functions as a governance-enhancing capability that improves banks’ risk identification and capital allocation efficiency, thereby reducing their exposure to risk-weighted assets. Design/methodology/approach Using panel data on 138 Chinese commercial banks from 2010 to 2023, this study constructs a comprehensive digital transformation index based on the Peking University DTI and applies fixed-effects, instrumental-variable and matching estimations (propensity score matching and entropy balancing) to identify the causal impact of digitalization on banks’ risk-taking. Findings The empirical results demonstrate that digital transformation significantly reduces the proportion of risk-weighted assets (RWAR), indicating improved control over banks’ overall risk exposure. The mechanism analysis identifies two key internal governance channels – enhanced risk recognition and more efficient capital allocation – through which digitalization indirectly mitigates proactive risk-taking. Research limitations/implications This study is limited to Chinese banks and may not fully capture cross-country institutional differences. Future research can expand on multi-country panel comparisons to generalize findings. The endogenous nature of digitalization remains a challenge despite robust identification strategies. Practical implications The findings of this study underscore the importance of developing artificial intelligence-driven risk governance platforms. Regulators are encouraged to design digital policy incentives that account for regional and institutional heterogeneity. Meanwhile, banks should incorporate digital tools into their compliance oversight and capital planning processes. Social implications Enhancing digital governance in banking contributes to financial stability, mitigates capital misallocation and fosters sustainable growth in emerging markets. Strategically targeted digital transformation can help reduce regional disparities in banking system resilience. Originality/value This paper introduces the concept of digital risk governance mechanisms and reframes the digital–finance nexus through the lens of risk governance theory. This study contributes to the literature on technology-enabled financial regulation and offers actionable insights for emerging markets aiming to develop resilient, technology-driven frameworks for capital optimization and supervisory compliance.

Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance
Dongbei University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
4.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.