Common sense and critical pedagogy

Abstract This article critically examines the concept of common sense within the context of critical pedagogy, exploring its role as both a potential obstacle and a tool in counter-hegemonic education. Drawing on the work of Wittgenstein, and of theorists such as Dotson and Kumashiro, the article argues that hegemonic common sense constrains educational practices by reinforcing dominant social norms, thus marginalizing alternative forms of knowledge and life. The analysis challenges Carusi’s argument that a counter-hegemonic common sense is not only possible but necessary, suggesting instead that such a common sense is inherently difficult to achieve due to its incommensurability with hegemonic norms. Through a Wittgensteinian lens, the article contends that whilst theory is crucial for the development of counter-hegemonic ideas, the existential and epistemic challenges they present may render them unintelligible within the framework of dominant common sense. This article suggests some possible approaches to ‘counter-hegemonic’ teaching material.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Philosophy of Education
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhaf079
Primary Topic
Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Common sense and critical pedagogy

Richard Stopford
Journal of Philosophy of Education
Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
article

Common sense and critical pedagogy

Richard Stopford
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article critically examines the concept of common sense within the context of critical pedagogy, exploring its role as both a potential obstacle and a tool in counter-hegemonic education. Drawing on the work of Wittgenstein, and of theorists such as Dotson and Kumashiro, the article argues that hegemonic common sense constrains educational practices by reinforcing dominant social norms, thus marginalizing alternative forms of knowledge and life. The analysis challenges Carusi’s argument that a counter-hegemonic common sense is not only possible but necessary, suggesting instead that such a common sense is inherently difficult to achieve due to its incommensurability with hegemonic norms. Through a Wittgensteinian lens, the article contends that whilst theory is crucial for the development of counter-hegemonic ideas, the existential and epistemic challenges they present may render them unintelligible within the framework of dominant common sense. This article suggests some possible approaches to ‘counter-hegemonic’ teaching material.

Journal of Philosophy of Education
Durham University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.