Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Preoperative and Postoperative Imaging Findings

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is increasingly used for a variety of complex shoulder abnormalities, particularly in patients with rotator cuff deficiency. Design improvements with better biomechanics have led to improved clinical outcomes, but the radiographic appearance and complication profile of contemporary RTSA implants differ from those of a decade ago. Plain radiographs can be used to identify whether the prosthesis is medialized (primarily older prostheses) or lateralized. A standardized imaging protocol and a reporting checklist are vital for the identification of complications. Although most complications can be identified with standard radiography, CT and MRI performed with dedicated protocols to reduce metallic artifacts are helpful problem-solving adjuncts. US can be used to assess the surrounding muscles before and after RTSA, to evaluate for postoperative complications such as fluid collections, and to provide guidance for aspiration. Complications such as periprosthetic fracture, instability, loosening, scapular notching, and implant failure require focused search patterns for identification. More chronic complications such as stress fractures and tuberosity fragmentation require comparison with previously acquired images. Implant disassembly, rarely seen with other arthroplasties, can occur and requires familiarity with the expected appearance of the prosthesis components. A downloadable checklist for imaging evaluation of the prosthesis is provided, and imaging examples of common and uncommon complications are presented. After reviewing this article, the reader will have an improved understanding of the RTSA prosthesis and will be able to recognize the normal and abnormal imaging appearances of this increasingly popular type of shoulder replacement. <sup>©</sup>RSNA, 2025 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiographics
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.240251
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Preoperative and Postoperative Imaging Findings

Susan E. Braley, Rajul Gupta, Brian M. Grawe, Tim T. Klostermeier et al.
Radiographics
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Preoperative and Postoperative Imaging Findings

Susan E. Braley, Rajul Gupta, Brian M. Grawe, Tim T. Klostermeier, Paul J. McMillan, Aakanksha Sriwastwa
article en

Abstract

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is increasingly used for a variety of complex shoulder abnormalities, particularly in patients with rotator cuff deficiency. Design improvements with better biomechanics have led to improved clinical outcomes, but the radiographic appearance and complication profile of contemporary RTSA implants differ from those of a decade ago. Plain radiographs can be used to identify whether the prosthesis is medialized (primarily older prostheses) or lateralized. A standardized imaging protocol and a reporting checklist are vital for the identification of complications. Although most complications can be identified with standard radiography, CT and MRI performed with dedicated protocols to reduce metallic artifacts are helpful problem-solving adjuncts. US can be used to assess the surrounding muscles before and after RTSA, to evaluate for postoperative complications such as fluid collections, and to provide guidance for aspiration. Complications such as periprosthetic fracture, instability, loosening, scapular notching, and implant failure require focused search patterns for identification. More chronic complications such as stress fractures and tuberosity fragmentation require comparison with previously acquired images. Implant disassembly, rarely seen with other arthroplasties, can occur and requires familiarity with the expected appearance of the prosthesis components. A downloadable checklist for imaging evaluation of the prosthesis is provided, and imaging examples of common and uncommon complications are presented. After reviewing this article, the reader will have an improved understanding of the RTSA prosthesis and will be able to recognize the normal and abnormal imaging appearances of this increasingly popular type of shoulder replacement. <sup>©</sup>RSNA, 2025 Supplemental material is available for this article.

RadiographicsVol. 45(12)
University of Cincinnati (US), University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.