Both stellar mass and gravitational potential shape the gas-phase metallicity

ABSTRACT The relation between metallicity and galaxy mass (the so-called mass–metallicity relation) is the strongest and most prominent among scaling relations between chemical enrichment and galactic properties. However, it is unclear whether this relation primarily traces metal retention or the integrated production of metals, as past studies have obtained contrasting results. We investigate this issue through an extensive Random Forest and Partial Correlations analysis of spectral cubes of 4500 galaxies from the MaNGA survey. We find that stellar mass ($M_*$) and baryonic gravitational potential ($\Phi _* = M_*/R_\mathrm{ e}$) are the two most important quantities determining gas metallicity in galaxies. However, their relative roles strongly depend on the galactocentric radius – the metallicity within 0.7 $\rm R_e$ depends primarily on the stellar mass, while the metallicity at radii beyond 0.9 $\rm R_e$ depends primarily on the gravitational potential. This finding can be interpreted in terms of metals in the central region ($\rm \mathit{ R}\le 0.7\,R_e$) being mostly bound, regardless of the global gravitational potential and, therefore, the metallicity is determined primarily by the cumulative production of metals (hence the integrated star formation history, i.e. $M_*$); by contrast, in the galactic peripheries the retention of metals depends more critically on the gravitational potential, hence the stronger dependence of the metallicity on $\rm \Phi _*$ at large radii. Our finding reconciles apparent discrepancies between previous results. Finally, we find that the Star Formation Rate is the third most important parameter (after $M_*$ and $\rm \Phi _*$) in determining the metallicity, as expected from the Fundamental Metallicity Relation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf2011
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Both stellar mass and gravitational potential shape the gas-phase metallicity

R. Maiolino, William Baker, M. Koller
1 citations
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
1.15
article

Both stellar mass and gravitational potential shape the gas-phase metallicity

R. Maiolino, William Baker, M. Koller
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The relation between metallicity and galaxy mass (the so-called mass–metallicity relation) is the strongest and most prominent among scaling relations between chemical enrichment and galactic properties. However, it is unclear whether this relation primarily traces metal retention or the integrated production of metals, as past studies have obtained contrasting results. We investigate this issue through an extensive Random Forest and Partial Correlations analysis of spectral cubes of 4500 galaxies from the MaNGA survey. We find that stellar mass ($M_*$) and baryonic gravitational potential ($\Phi _* = M_*/R_\mathrm{ e}$) are the two most important quantities determining gas metallicity in galaxies. However, their relative roles strongly depend on the galactocentric radius – the metallicity within 0.7 $\rm R_e$ depends primarily on the stellar mass, while the metallicity at radii beyond 0.9 $\rm R_e$ depends primarily on the gravitational potential. This finding can be interpreted in terms of metals in the central region ($\rm \mathit{ R}\le 0.7\,R_e$) being mostly bound, regardless of the global gravitational potential and, therefore, the metallicity is determined primarily by the cumulative production of metals (hence the integrated star formation history, i.e. $M_*$); by contrast, in the galactic peripheries the retention of metals depends more critically on the gravitational potential, hence the stronger dependence of the metallicity on $\rm \Phi _*$ at large radii. Our finding reconciles apparent discrepancies between previous results. Finally, we find that the Star Formation Rate is the third most important parameter (after $M_*$ and $\rm \Phi _*$) in determining the metallicity, as expected from the Fundamental Metallicity Relation.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyVol. 545(1)
University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Cambridge (GB), University College London (GB)
Smithsonian Institution, U.S. Department of Energy, Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, Yale University, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Vanderbilt University, Ohio State University, University of Utah, University of Washington, Johns Hopkins University, Carnegie Mellon University, University of Notre Dame, Villum Fonden, University of Portsmouth, New Mexico State University, UK Research and Innovation, York University, University of Oxford, Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Max-Planck-Institut für Astrophysik, Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, Office of Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Girton College, University of Cambridge, Science and Technology Facilities Council, Leibniz-Gemeinschaft, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.