<sup>68</sup> Ga-PSMA-11 in Staging of Unfavorable Intermediate- and High-Risk Prostate Cancer Reduces Indication for Noncurative Prostatectomy: A Prospective, Multicenter, IAEA Study
Accurate staging of unfavorable intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) is essential for treatment decisions. Conventional imaging often fails to detect lymph node, bone, and visceral metastases, and for this purpose <sup>68</sup>Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 PET/CT is clinically used. This prospective, multicenter, International Atomic Energy Agency-supported trial evaluated the accuracy of <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for initial staging compared with MRI and histopathology and the impact of <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT on determining surgical eligibility. <b>Methods:</b> In a prospective, international study supported by the International Atomic Energy Agency, 775 patients with high-risk or unfavorable intermediate-risk PCa from 12 centers across 11 countries-including low-, middle-, and high-income settings, scheduled for radical prostatectomy based on conventional imaging (including bone scanning and pelvic MRI) underwent <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT before treatment. PET and MRI findings were compared with radical prostatectomy histopathology, and the impact of PET on radical prostatectomy was assessed. <b>Results:</b> <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT detected metastatic disease (M1) in 20.4% of cases, altering management and preventing prostatectomy in 24.0%. The accuracy for seminal vesicle invasion was 90.1% for <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT versus 57.3% for MRI, and for lymph node metastases it was 91.1% for <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT versus 69.7% for MRI. In 13.1% of patients (78/593), there were discordant results between <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and histopathology. <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT had false-negative lymph node findings in 8.6% of cases, with the most clinically significant being 4.5% of patients incorrectly staged as N0. False-positive lymph node findings at <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT occurred in 4.5% of patients. <b>Conclusion:</b> <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT significantly improves staging accuracy, reducing the indication for prostatectomy and impacting treatment decisions. These findings, from a broad international cohort including low-, middle-, and high-income countries, support the global adoption of <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT into standard staging protocols for high-risk PCa.
Authors
- Diana Páez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9268-0979)
- Murilo Luz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0575-5635)
- Jolanta Kunikowska (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7434-6720)
- Enrique Estrada Lobato (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2597-8609)
- Mohamad Haidar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6431-3274)
- Osvaldo García-Mata (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7791-0983)
- Stefano Fanti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1486-2624)
- Akram Al‐Ibraheem (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0978-4716)
- Muhammad Moiz Nasir (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2645-7530)
- Juliano J. Cerci (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7449-9252)
- Umut Elboğa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3650-8258)
- Fuad Novruzov (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3175-0459)
- Rakesh Kumar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4076-0042)
- Francisca Redondo Moneda
Institutions
- International Atomic Energy Agency (AT)
- Mount Sinai Health System (US)
- Ankara University (TR)
- Medical University of Warsaw (PL)
- King Hussein Cancer Center (JO)
- American University of Beirut Medical Center (LB)
- Azienda USL di Bologna (IT)
- National Nuclear Research Center (AZ)
- National Heart Institute (MY)
- Complejo Asistencial Sótero del Río (CL)
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (MX)
- Gaziantep University (TR)
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Nuclear Medicine
- Published
- 2025-11-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.125.270537
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.52