The Preference Selection Index (PSI) in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making: A Systematic and Critical Review of Applications, Integrations, and Future Directions

This paper presents a systematic review of the performance of the Preference Selection Index (PSI) application in multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems based on PRISMA. This work extensively reviewed more than 100 studies to investigate the methodological bases of the PSI and its synergistic combination with other decision-making methodologies. Interestingly, the PSI is highly commended as one of the most straightforward applications with low computational effort, which implies that the PSI in this context is receiving wide attention for complex decisions and sensitive judgments, where assigning criteria weights is challenging. However, in some circumstances, the PSI mechanism in assigning weights becomes a drawback when the accuracy of the decision is crucial. However, despite the increased use of the PSI, there is still a lack of systematic evaluation of its methodological sensitivity of weighting assumptions, consistency, and comparative performance in the hybrid MCDM problems. Addressing these gaps will help make the PSI more accurate in the evolving landscape of decision-making techniques. This review underscores the wide use of the PSI, encouraging further research in terms of its applications and methodology enhancement, ensuring that the PSI remains a relevant option that evolves the complexity and sensitivity of decision-making in various areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematical and Computational Applications
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/mca30060124
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Preference Selection Index (PSI) in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making: A Systematic and Critical Review of Applications, Integrations, and Future Directions

Mohammed Said Obeidat, Abdullah S. Obeidat, Hala Al Sliti
1 citations
Mathematical and Computational Applications
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
2.11
article

The Preference Selection Index (PSI) in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making: A Systematic and Critical Review of Applications, Integrations, and Future Directions

Mohammed Said Obeidat, Abdullah S. Obeidat, Hala Al Sliti
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a systematic review of the performance of the Preference Selection Index (PSI) application in multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems based on PRISMA. This work extensively reviewed more than 100 studies to investigate the methodological bases of the PSI and its synergistic combination with other decision-making methodologies. Interestingly, the PSI is highly commended as one of the most straightforward applications with low computational effort, which implies that the PSI in this context is receiving wide attention for complex decisions and sensitive judgments, where assigning criteria weights is challenging. However, in some circumstances, the PSI mechanism in assigning weights becomes a drawback when the accuracy of the decision is crucial. However, despite the increased use of the PSI, there is still a lack of systematic evaluation of its methodological sensitivity of weighting assumptions, consistency, and comparative performance in the hybrid MCDM problems. Addressing these gaps will help make the PSI more accurate in the evolving landscape of decision-making techniques. This review underscores the wide use of the PSI, encouraging further research in terms of its applications and methodology enhancement, ensuring that the PSI remains a relevant option that evolves the complexity and sensitivity of decision-making in various areas.

Mathematical and Computational ApplicationsVol. 30(6)
Binghamton University (US), Jordan University of Science and Technology (JO), American University of the Middle East (KW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.