Allocentric spatial representations dominate when switching between real and virtual worlds

After removing a virtual reality headset, people can be surprised to find that they are facing a different direction than expected. Here, we investigated if people can maintain spatial representations of one environment while immersed in another. In the first three experiments, stationary participants were asked to point to previously seen targets in one environment, either the real world or a virtual environment, while in the other environment. We varied the amount of misalignment between the two environments (detectable or undetectable), the virtual environment itself (lab or kitchen), and the instructions (general or egocentric priming). Pointing endpoints were based primarily on the locations of objects in the currently seen environment, suggesting a strong reliance on allocentric cues. In the fourth experiment, participants moved in virtual reality while keeping track of an unseen real-world target. We confirmed that the pointing errors were due to a reliance on the currently seen environment. It appears that people hardly ever keep track of object positions in a previously seen environment and instead primarily rely on currently available spatial information to plan their actions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.13.7
Primary Topic
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Allocentric spatial representations dominate when switching between real and virtual worlds

Katja Fiehler, Meaghan McManus, Immo Schütz, Franziska Seifert
Journal of Vision
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
article

Allocentric spatial representations dominate when switching between real and virtual worlds

Katja Fiehler, Meaghan McManus, Immo Schütz, Franziska Seifert
article en

Abstract

After removing a virtual reality headset, people can be surprised to find that they are facing a different direction than expected. Here, we investigated if people can maintain spatial representations of one environment while immersed in another. In the first three experiments, stationary participants were asked to point to previously seen targets in one environment, either the real world or a virtual environment, while in the other environment. We varied the amount of misalignment between the two environments (detectable or undetectable), the virtual environment itself (lab or kitchen), and the instructions (general or egocentric priming). Pointing endpoints were based primarily on the locations of objects in the currently seen environment, suggesting a strong reliance on allocentric cues. In the fourth experiment, participants moved in virtual reality while keeping track of an unseen real-world target. We confirmed that the pointing errors were due to a reliance on the currently seen environment. It appears that people hardly ever keep track of object positions in a previously seen environment and instead primarily rely on currently available spatial information to plan their actions.

Journal of VisionVol. 25(13)
Twitter (United States) (US), Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE), St. Franziskus Hospital (DE)
Justus Liebig Universität Gießen, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.