From Community to Society: (Un)bound Pluralities in Eliot, Lewis, and Auden

This article demonstrates how Ferdinand Tönnies’s celebrated distinction between Gemeinschaft (community) and Gesellschaft (society) resonates in the works of T. S. Eliot, Wyndham Lewis, and W. H. Auden, who engage with the implications of rootedness, cosmopolitanism, and the erosion of traditional communities. These thinkers offer valuable insights into the ways in which the transition from Gemeinschaft to Gesellschaft reshaped social life, cultural identity, and individual consciousness. The paper examines these perspectives, contrasting the virtues of localized, organic communities with the challenges and opportunities posed by modern, cosmopolitan societies. It highlights the ongoing struggle to balance unity and diversity in a rapidly evolving world, where the preservation of cultural identity often clashes with the demands of global interconnectedness. Ultimately, this exploration underscores the enduring relevance of Tönnies’s framework and the continued search for meaning and community in the face of modernity’s transformative pressures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ES Review Spanish Journal of English Studies
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24197/a83kme83
Primary Topic
Modernist Literature and Criticism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Community to Society: (Un)bound Pluralities in Eliot, Lewis, and Auden

Ladislav Vít, Michal Kleprlík
ES Review Spanish Journal of English Studies
Modernist Literature and Criticism
article

From Community to Society: (Un)bound Pluralities in Eliot, Lewis, and Auden

Ladislav Vít, Michal Kleprlík
article en

Abstract

This article demonstrates how Ferdinand Tönnies’s celebrated distinction between Gemeinschaft (community) and Gesellschaft (society) resonates in the works of T. S. Eliot, Wyndham Lewis, and W. H. Auden, who engage with the implications of rootedness, cosmopolitanism, and the erosion of traditional communities. These thinkers offer valuable insights into the ways in which the transition from Gemeinschaft to Gesellschaft reshaped social life, cultural identity, and individual consciousness. The paper examines these perspectives, contrasting the virtues of localized, organic communities with the challenges and opportunities posed by modern, cosmopolitan societies. It highlights the ongoing struggle to balance unity and diversity in a rapidly evolving world, where the preservation of cultural identity often clashes with the demands of global interconnectedness. Ultimately, this exploration underscores the enduring relevance of Tönnies’s framework and the continued search for meaning and community in the face of modernity’s transformative pressures.

ES Review Spanish Journal of English Studies(46)
University of Pardubice (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Modernist Literature and Criticism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From Community to Society: (Un)bound Pluralities in Eliot, Lewis, and Auden — Ladislav Vít, Michal Kleprlík · ES Review Spanish Journal of English Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS