HOW CAN METAPHORS ENHANCE OUR UNDERSTANDING OF MEDIA AND INFORMATION LITERACIES?

Explaining abstract concepts to general audiences is a core challenge in media and information literacy. Studies show that metaphors can help translate complexity into ordinary terms, enabling broad audiences to understand, compare, and talk about difficult issues without specialist vocabulary. This article analyses how Estonian experts from academia, defence, media and education use metaphors to explain core media and information literacy concepts. Thirty semi-structured interviews were analysed using qualitative metaphor analysis. Five recurrent source domains emerged: FOOD for production and consumption, WATER for flow and direction, NOISE for overload and interference, PLAYGROUND for cooperation, and BATTLEFIELD for conflict. Careful, context-aware metaphor choice improves teaching, public communication and policy, while careless framing can oversimplify and polarise.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Trames Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2025.4.06
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

HOW CAN METAPHORS ENHANCE OUR UNDERSTANDING OF MEDIA AND INFORMATION LITERACIES?

Diana Poudel
Trames Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
article

HOW CAN METAPHORS ENHANCE OUR UNDERSTANDING OF MEDIA AND INFORMATION LITERACIES?

Diana Poudel
article en

Abstract

Explaining abstract concepts to general audiences is a core challenge in media and information literacy. Studies show that metaphors can help translate complexity into ordinary terms, enabling broad audiences to understand, compare, and talk about difficult issues without specialist vocabulary. This article analyses how Estonian experts from academia, defence, media and education use metaphors to explain core media and information literacy concepts. Thirty semi-structured interviews were analysed using qualitative metaphor analysis. Five recurrent source domains emerged: FOOD for production and consumption, WATER for flow and direction, NOISE for overload and interference, PLAYGROUND for cooperation, and BATTLEFIELD for conflict. Careful, context-aware metaphor choice improves teaching, public communication and policy, while careless framing can oversimplify and polarise.

Trames Journal of the Humanities and Social SciencesVol. 29(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.