Switching or selecting?

Abstract Discourse Markers (DMs) are particularly susceptible to borrowing between languages and several approaches can provide a framework to analyse speech in multilingual contexts. This paper examines a structural and a pragmatic-functional perspective: Myers-Scotton’s Matrix Language Frame (MLF) model and Matras’ Pragmatic-Functional (PF) perspective. It considers how DMs fit into these approaches and how they deal with code-switching in Kreol Morisien-French multilingual conversations. As it is rare to consider the same linguistic data from these different linguistic perspectives, this paper explores whether they are competing models or may offer complementary perspectives. MLF sees languages as distinct entities which are switched between, while PF involves context-appropriate selection of components from a complex repertoire. Matras’ pragmatic-dominance hypothesis is also explored through correlations with language use. Although the approaches emphasise different aspects of multilingual speech, it is concluded that together they can offer complementary perspectives on Mauritian discourse, despite being conceptually difficult to reconcile.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia-Pacific Language Variation
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/aplv.25006.dav
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Multilingual Education and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Switching or selecting?

Hannah Davidson
1 citations
Asia-Pacific Language Variation
Multilingual Education and Policy
6.13
article

Switching or selecting?

Hannah Davidson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Discourse Markers (DMs) are particularly susceptible to borrowing between languages and several approaches can provide a framework to analyse speech in multilingual contexts. This paper examines a structural and a pragmatic-functional perspective: Myers-Scotton’s Matrix Language Frame (MLF) model and Matras’ Pragmatic-Functional (PF) perspective. It considers how DMs fit into these approaches and how they deal with code-switching in Kreol Morisien-French multilingual conversations. As it is rare to consider the same linguistic data from these different linguistic perspectives, this paper explores whether they are competing models or may offer complementary perspectives. MLF sees languages as distinct entities which are switched between, while PF involves context-appropriate selection of components from a complex repertoire. Matras’ pragmatic-dominance hypothesis is also explored through correlations with language use. Although the approaches emphasise different aspects of multilingual speech, it is concluded that together they can offer complementary perspectives on Mauritian discourse, despite being conceptually difficult to reconcile.

Asia-Pacific Language VariationVol. 11(1-2)
University of Toronto (CA), University of Cambridge (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Multilingual Education and Policy
6.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.