Safety and Effectiveness of Two High- <i>G</i> ′ Soft Tissue Fillers for Chin Augmentation: A Prospective, Randomized, Comparator-Controlled, Evaluator-Blinded Trial
With no statistically significant difference in overall volume utilized between HASHA and HAVLX, HASHA injections required 15.27% less volume in the menton/pognion to achieve visual correction. Additionally, HASHA demonstrated a significantly higher efficiency score for correction of nasomental angle. Secondary endpoints were not significantly different and demonstrate both products as being safe and effective.
Authors
- Andreas Nikolis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9056-4998)
- Andrei I. Metelitsa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5482-680X)
- Tyler Safran (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0795-3109)
- Laura Raco
Institutions
- University of Calgary (CA)
- McGill University Health Centre (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Aesthetic Surgery Journal
- Published
- 2025-11-10
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf222
- Primary Topic
- Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00