Globally Critical Infrastructure: The Unique Risks and Challenges

Critical infrastructure is typically identified at the national level. However, disruption to certain infrastructure systems, facilities, and assets can have negative consequences for global societies. Such globally critical infrastructure entails a distinct risk profile for both countries dependent on the infrastructure, and countries that have such infrastructure in their territory. The goal of the article is to provide an initial framing and definition of "globally critical infrastructure" as a concept worthy of attention and explore the unique risk analysis and management challenges to support future, more rigorous examinations. For dependent countries, globally critical infrastructure exists outside of their border (or possibly outside any country's border), under sometimes drastically different economic, political, governance, and threat environments. Risk management entails unique challenges, because countries dependent on that infrastructure may have no legal or regulatory authority to shape risk management practices at facilities in other countries. Consequently, risk management may extend beyond the domains of the typical homeland or internal affairs agencies to include capabilities and responsibilities of ministries of foreign affairs, trade and commerce, and defense. However, those challenges also imply new risk management demands and options, such as new avenues for international cooperation on infrastructure protection and resilience, international funding, and enhanced monitoring. Having a globally critical infrastructure system in its borders changes the risk dynamics for a nation state, creating potential leverage over dependent nations and new avenues to garner international support, but also creates new risks to national sovereignty. Recognizing these common dependencies can better enable the global community to engage stakeholders to develop and implement systemic risk management approaches worldwide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Risk Analysis
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.70147
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Globally Critical Infrastructure: The Unique Risks and Challenges

Henry H. Willis, Zachary Kallenborn
1 citations
Risk Analysis
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
0.95
article

Globally Critical Infrastructure: The Unique Risks and Challenges

Henry H. Willis, Zachary Kallenborn
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Critical infrastructure is typically identified at the national level. However, disruption to certain infrastructure systems, facilities, and assets can have negative consequences for global societies. Such globally critical infrastructure entails a distinct risk profile for both countries dependent on the infrastructure, and countries that have such infrastructure in their territory. The goal of the article is to provide an initial framing and definition of "globally critical infrastructure" as a concept worthy of attention and explore the unique risk analysis and management challenges to support future, more rigorous examinations. For dependent countries, globally critical infrastructure exists outside of their border (or possibly outside any country's border), under sometimes drastically different economic, political, governance, and threat environments. Risk management entails unique challenges, because countries dependent on that infrastructure may have no legal or regulatory authority to shape risk management practices at facilities in other countries. Consequently, risk management may extend beyond the domains of the typical homeland or internal affairs agencies to include capabilities and responsibilities of ministries of foreign affairs, trade and commerce, and defense. However, those challenges also imply new risk management demands and options, such as new avenues for international cooperation on infrastructure protection and resilience, international funding, and enhanced monitoring. Having a globally critical infrastructure system in its borders changes the risk dynamics for a nation state, creating potential leverage over dependent nations and new avenues to garner international support, but also creates new risks to national sovereignty. Recognizing these common dependencies can better enable the global community to engage stakeholders to develop and implement systemic risk management approaches worldwide.

Risk AnalysisVol. 45(12)
Center for Strategic and International Studies (US), RAND Corporation (US), George Mason University (US), King's College London (GB), Oxford Research Group (GB), University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.