Barriers and facilitators to collaboration between traditional and biomedical mental health services in a post-conflict healthcare system: A qualitative study in Tigray, Ethiopia

The World Health Organisation advocates a biopsychosocial model combining traditional and biomedical care to address mental health gaps, especially in low-resource, conflict-affected health systems. This study explores the factors influencing collaboration between traditional and biomedical mental health services in Tigray, where research on such collaborative care remains limited. In-depth interviews were conducted with 50 participants, including biomedical practitioners, traditional healers, and service users from both modalities of care in Tigray, Ethiopia. Interviews focused on perspectives of the need for more collaboration and the barriers and enablers to achieving a collaborative mental health system. A thematic framework analysis approach was employed for data analysis, utilising NVivo qualitative data analysis software. Traditional practitioners, biomedical practitioners, and their service users recognised the value of collaboration in mental health care in a post-conflict Tigray context, despite acknowledging the presence of challenges. Safety concerns, unclear roles, coordination gaps, and fear of combined treatment effects were barriers to collaboration. Facilitators include opportunities arising from experience sharing by international organisations, as well as existing psychosocial and spiritual rituals. The study revealed opportunities for collaboration between traditional and biomedical mental health services within post-conflict healthcare systems. Despite existing challenges, both practitioners and service users demonstrated a strong willingness to collaborate and utilise these services. These findings showed the need for contextual collaborative care strategies to enhance mental health care and foster community healing in post-conflict settings. • Collaborative mental health care is effective but poorly implemented in Tigray. • Study reveals barriers and facilitators to care in post-conflict health systems. • Identifies context-specific factors affecting mental health collaboration. • Offers insights into traditional and biomedical service coordination. • Recommends research on collaborative care strategies in post-conflict.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SSM - Health Systems
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100153
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ureteral procedures and complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.06
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers and facilitators to collaboration between traditional and biomedical mental health services in a post-conflict healthcare system: A qualitative study in Tigray, Ethiopia

Kenfe Tesfay Berhe, Lillian Mwanri, Hailay Abrha Gesesew, Paul Ward
1 citations
SSM - Health Systems
Ureteral procedures and complications
2.06
article

Barriers and facilitators to collaboration between traditional and biomedical mental health services in a post-conflict healthcare system: A qualitative study in Tigray, Ethiopia

Kenfe Tesfay Berhe, Lillian Mwanri, Hailay Abrha Gesesew, Paul Ward
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The World Health Organisation advocates a biopsychosocial model combining traditional and biomedical care to address mental health gaps, especially in low-resource, conflict-affected health systems. This study explores the factors influencing collaboration between traditional and biomedical mental health services in Tigray, where research on such collaborative care remains limited. In-depth interviews were conducted with 50 participants, including biomedical practitioners, traditional healers, and service users from both modalities of care in Tigray, Ethiopia. Interviews focused on perspectives of the need for more collaboration and the barriers and enablers to achieving a collaborative mental health system. A thematic framework analysis approach was employed for data analysis, utilising NVivo qualitative data analysis software. Traditional practitioners, biomedical practitioners, and their service users recognised the value of collaboration in mental health care in a post-conflict Tigray context, despite acknowledging the presence of challenges. Safety concerns, unclear roles, coordination gaps, and fear of combined treatment effects were barriers to collaboration. Facilitators include opportunities arising from experience sharing by international organisations, as well as existing psychosocial and spiritual rituals. The study revealed opportunities for collaboration between traditional and biomedical mental health services within post-conflict healthcare systems. Despite existing challenges, both practitioners and service users demonstrated a strong willingness to collaborate and utilise these services. These findings showed the need for contextual collaborative care strategies to enhance mental health care and foster community healing in post-conflict settings. • Collaborative mental health care is effective but poorly implemented in Tigray. • Study reveals barriers and facilitators to care in post-conflict health systems. • Identifies context-specific factors affecting mental health collaboration. • Offers insights into traditional and biomedical service coordination. • Recommends research on collaborative care strategies in post-conflict.

SSM - Health SystemsVol. 5
Torrens University Australia (AU), Mekelle University (ET)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Ureteral procedures and complications
2.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.