Patterns and outcomes of low vision rehabilitation in low vision subspecialty clinic, Cairo University hospitals

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of low vision aids (LVAs) in improving both distance and near vision among patients with low vision of various etiologies and to identify the most used low vision devices. This retrospective study reviewed 149 patient files from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2023. Visual acuity assessments included distant visual acuity measured unilaterally and bilaterally at 3 m using the Distance Test Chart (Lea symbols) before and after using LVAs (monocular or binocular telescopes). Near visual acuity was tested using the Lea symbols line test charts progressing from 8.00 M to 0.32 M, measured binocularly at the patient’s preferred distance and then at 25 cm using a +4.00 D reading add. Reading acuity was assessed using printed Arabic texts in different Times New Roman fonts before and after using LVAs (magnifiers, prismatic glasses, etc.). The diagnosis of ocular diseases causing low vision was recorded. ARMD and Macular dystrophies were the most common causes of low vision (18.1% and 17.4% respectively). There was a statistically significant improvement in near and reading visual acuity ( p < .001). The use of LVAs improved reading and near visual acuity by 3.57 ± 1.76 and 2.25 ± 2.79 lines, respectively. The percentage of patients able to read font size 2 increased from 2.7% to 53.0% after using near vision aids. A statistically significant improvement in distance visual acuity was also found ( p < .001), with a mean improvement of 2.40 ± 1.97 lines. As a conclusion; LVAs are an effective means of providing visual rehabilitation for distance, near, and reading vision among patients with low vision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Visual Impairment
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02646196251356193
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patterns and outcomes of low vision rehabilitation in low vision subspecialty clinic, Cairo University hospitals

Shahenda Ahmed El Gharbawy, Maha A. Albadawi, Esraa El-Mayah
British Journal of Visual Impairment
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Patterns and outcomes of low vision rehabilitation in low vision subspecialty clinic, Cairo University hospitals

Shahenda Ahmed El Gharbawy, Maha A. Albadawi, Esraa El-Mayah
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of low vision aids (LVAs) in improving both distance and near vision among patients with low vision of various etiologies and to identify the most used low vision devices. This retrospective study reviewed 149 patient files from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2023. Visual acuity assessments included distant visual acuity measured unilaterally and bilaterally at 3 m using the Distance Test Chart (Lea symbols) before and after using LVAs (monocular or binocular telescopes). Near visual acuity was tested using the Lea symbols line test charts progressing from 8.00 M to 0.32 M, measured binocularly at the patient’s preferred distance and then at 25 cm using a +4.00 D reading add. Reading acuity was assessed using printed Arabic texts in different Times New Roman fonts before and after using LVAs (magnifiers, prismatic glasses, etc.). The diagnosis of ocular diseases causing low vision was recorded. ARMD and Macular dystrophies were the most common causes of low vision (18.1% and 17.4% respectively). There was a statistically significant improvement in near and reading visual acuity ( p < .001). The use of LVAs improved reading and near visual acuity by 3.57 ± 1.76 and 2.25 ± 2.79 lines, respectively. The percentage of patients able to read font size 2 increased from 2.7% to 53.0% after using near vision aids. A statistically significant improvement in distance visual acuity was also found ( p < .001), with a mean improvement of 2.40 ± 1.97 lines. As a conclusion; LVAs are an effective means of providing visual rehabilitation for distance, near, and reading vision among patients with low vision.

British Journal of Visual Impairment
Cairo University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Patterns and outcomes of low vision rehabilitation in low vision subspecialty clinic, Cairo University hospitals — Shahenda Ahmed El Gharbawy, Maha A. Albadawi, et al. · British Journal of Visual Impairment (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS