An Index of Her Own: An Investigation of the Proportion of Women Indexed in Evolutionary Psychology Textbooks

A gender bias that disadvantages women is ubiquitous in academia. It has been demonstrated across a broad range of domains, including grant awards and peer review. Previous research has also found that this bias is reflected in textbooks. Here we evaluated seven books on evolutionary psychology, five of which were edited volumes. We assessed whether (1) women were less likely to be indexed than men and (2) women were less likely to be a contributor to edited volumes than men. In addition, we examined which women were featured in more than one book. Using descriptive statistics and meta-analytical techniques, we found that around 1 in 4 entries in the book indexes were women, and around 4 in 10 contributors to edited volumes were women. We discuss the potential mechanisms that could produce these findings. Finally, we offer suggestions on how the inclusion of women in citations could be improved.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Ethology
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22330/001c.147268
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Index of Her Own: An Investigation of the Proportion of Women Indexed in Evolutionary Psychology Textbooks

Thomas V. Pollet, Jeanne Bovet, Louise Barrett, Elizabeth Renner
Human Ethology
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

An Index of Her Own: An Investigation of the Proportion of Women Indexed in Evolutionary Psychology Textbooks

Thomas V. Pollet, Jeanne Bovet, Louise Barrett, Elizabeth Renner
article en

Abstract

A gender bias that disadvantages women is ubiquitous in academia. It has been demonstrated across a broad range of domains, including grant awards and peer review. Previous research has also found that this bias is reflected in textbooks. Here we evaluated seven books on evolutionary psychology, five of which were edited volumes. We assessed whether (1) women were less likely to be indexed than men and (2) women were less likely to be a contributor to edited volumes than men. In addition, we examined which women were featured in more than one book. Using descriptive statistics and meta-analytical techniques, we found that around 1 in 4 entries in the book indexes were women, and around 4 in 10 contributors to edited volumes were women. We discuss the potential mechanisms that could produce these findings. Finally, we offer suggestions on how the inclusion of women in citations could be improved.

Human EthologyVol. 40(1)
University of Lethbridge (CA), Northumbria University (GB)
Northumbria University
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.