Nonparametric estimation of matching efficiency and elasticity on a private on-the-job search platform: Evidence from Japan, 2014–2024

I analyze proprietary data from BizReach (2014–2024) to estimate the matching function for high-skill workers on a private on-the-job search platform using Lange and Papageorgiou (2020) nonparametric approach. Comparing it to Hello Work, I find that matching efficiency on the private platform is both more volatile and higher, reflecting its growing popularity. Matching elasticity with respect to users is around 0.75, while for vacancies, it reaches 1.0, suggesting a more balanced elasticity than Hello Work. The study also uncovers industry-level heterogeneity, highlighting differences in matching dynamics across sectors. • Estimates matching efficiency using nonparametric methods on platform data. • Compares private and public platforms using a unified matching framework. • Finds higher responsiveness and volatility in private, scout-based matching. • Policy section links findings to Japan’s ongoing Hello Work reforms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Japanese and International Economies
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjie.2025.101394
Primary Topic
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nonparametric estimation of matching efficiency and elasticity on a private on-the-job search platform: Evidence from Japan, 2014–2024

Suguru Otani
Journal of the Japanese and International Economies
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
article

Nonparametric estimation of matching efficiency and elasticity on a private on-the-job search platform: Evidence from Japan, 2014–2024

Suguru Otani
article en

Abstract

I analyze proprietary data from BizReach (2014–2024) to estimate the matching function for high-skill workers on a private on-the-job search platform using Lange and Papageorgiou (2020) nonparametric approach. Comparing it to Hello Work, I find that matching efficiency on the private platform is both more volatile and higher, reflecting its growing popularity. Matching elasticity with respect to users is around 0.75, while for vacancies, it reaches 1.0, suggesting a more balanced elasticity than Hello Work. The study also uncovers industry-level heterogeneity, highlighting differences in matching dynamics across sectors. • Estimates matching efficiency using nonparametric methods on platform data. • Compares private and public platforms using a unified matching framework. • Finds higher responsiveness and volatility in private, scout-based matching. • Policy section links findings to Japan’s ongoing Hello Work reforms.

Journal of the Japanese and International EconomiesVol. 79
Japan University of Economics (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.