The Dark Side of <scp>AI</scp> in Insurance: A Systematic Review of Mechanisms Linking <scp>AI</scp> Design Features to Consumer Harm

ABSTRACT Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping insurance services, yet it introduces significant consumer risks such as privacy erosion, service exclusion, and trust deterioration. This systematic review clarifies how specific AI features—algorithmic opacity, hyper‐personalization, and data‐driven bias—trigger psychological responses and shape consumer decisions, ultimately producing negative outcomes. Drawing from 33 empirical studies, the review organizes fragmented findings using the TCCM (Theory–Context–Characteristic–Method) framework, revealing theoretical fragmentation, geographical concentration, and methodological imbalance. To move beyond static categorizations, the study proposes a novel Trigger–Psychology–Decision–Outcome (TPDO) framework that maps sequential pathways of consumer harm. Findings show that adverse consumer outcomes emerge primarily through fairness concerns, anxiety, and perceived loss of control, influencing behaviors such as disengagement and resistance to AI‐enabled insurance systems. This mechanism‐based synthesis provides theoretical clarity, outlines targeted avenues for future research, and informs consumer‐centric governance of algorithmic insurance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Consumer Affairs
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.70034
Primary Topic
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Dark Side of AI in Insurance: A Systematic Review of Mechanisms Linking AI Design Features to Consumer Harm

Yaliu Yang, Xiaowei Zheng, Qin Lingda Tan, Zhangwei Zheng
Journal of Consumer Affairs
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
article

The Dark Side of AI in Insurance: A Systematic Review of Mechanisms Linking AI Design Features to Consumer Harm

Yaliu Yang, Xiaowei Zheng, Qin Lingda Tan, Zhangwei Zheng
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping insurance services, yet it introduces significant consumer risks such as privacy erosion, service exclusion, and trust deterioration. This systematic review clarifies how specific AI features—algorithmic opacity, hyper‐personalization, and data‐driven bias—trigger psychological responses and shape consumer decisions, ultimately producing negative outcomes. Drawing from 33 empirical studies, the review organizes fragmented findings using the TCCM (Theory–Context–Characteristic–Method) framework, revealing theoretical fragmentation, geographical concentration, and methodological imbalance. To move beyond static categorizations, the study proposes a novel Trigger–Psychology–Decision–Outcome (TPDO) framework that maps sequential pathways of consumer harm. Findings show that adverse consumer outcomes emerge primarily through fairness concerns, anxiety, and perceived loss of control, influencing behaviors such as disengagement and resistance to AI‐enabled insurance systems. This mechanism‐based synthesis provides theoretical clarity, outlines targeted avenues for future research, and informs consumer‐centric governance of algorithmic insurance.

Journal of Consumer AffairsVol. 59(4)
Suzhou University of Science and Technology (CN), Soochow University (CN), National University of Malaysia (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.