Acquisition of Spacers from Foreign Prokaryotic Genomes by CRISPR-Cas Systems in Natural Environments

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated (Cas) systems of bacteria and archaea provide immunities against mobile genetic elements, like viruses. In addition, protospacer analyses revealed a very specific acquisition of CRISPR spacers derived from genomes of related species or from closely interacting episymbiont genomes as recently shown for subsurface archaea. However, the origin of most of the spacers that can be found in CRISPR-Cas systems from natural environments has not been deciphered. Here, by analyzing CRISPR-Cas systems of metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) from two subsurface environments spanning more than 1 Tb of sequencing data, we show that a substantial proportion of CRISPR spacers are acquired from DNA of other prokaryotes inhabiting the same environment. As such, we found that the number of respective spacers can be up to three times higher than the number of self-targeting spacers. Statistical analyses demonstrated that the acquisition of CRISPR spacers from other prokaryotic genomes is partly explained by the relative abundance of the MAG containing the protospacer, as well as by other factors, such as the total number of CRISPR arrays present in a MAG with the respective spacers. Further, we found that spacer acquisition from foreign prokaryotic DNA occurs in almost all types of CRISPR-Cas systems, but shows preferences for subtypes of CRISPR-Cas systems that differ across the investigated ecosystems. Taken together, our results shed new light on the diversity of CRISPR spacers in natural microbial communities and provide an explanation for some of the many unmatched spacers in public databases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Genome Biology and Evolution
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evaf201
Primary Topic
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acquisition of Spacers from Foreign Prokaryotic Genomes by CRISPR-Cas Systems in Natural Environments

Julia Plewka, André Soares, S. Emil Ruff, Alexander J. Probst et al.
Genome Biology and Evolution
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
article

Acquisition of Spacers from Foreign Prokaryotic Genomes by CRISPR-Cas Systems in Natural Environments

Julia Plewka, André Soares, S. Emil Ruff, Alexander J. Probst, Sarah P. Esser, Perla Abigail Figueroa-Gonzalez, Cristina Moraru, Till L. V. Bornemann, Katharina Sures, Carrie J. Moore
article en

Abstract

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated (Cas) systems of bacteria and archaea provide immunities against mobile genetic elements, like viruses. In addition, protospacer analyses revealed a very specific acquisition of CRISPR spacers derived from genomes of related species or from closely interacting episymbiont genomes as recently shown for subsurface archaea. However, the origin of most of the spacers that can be found in CRISPR-Cas systems from natural environments has not been deciphered. Here, by analyzing CRISPR-Cas systems of metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) from two subsurface environments spanning more than 1 Tb of sequencing data, we show that a substantial proportion of CRISPR spacers are acquired from DNA of other prokaryotes inhabiting the same environment. As such, we found that the number of respective spacers can be up to three times higher than the number of self-targeting spacers. Statistical analyses demonstrated that the acquisition of CRISPR spacers from other prokaryotic genomes is partly explained by the relative abundance of the MAG containing the protospacer, as well as by other factors, such as the total number of CRISPR arrays present in a MAG with the respective spacers. Further, we found that spacer acquisition from foreign prokaryotic DNA occurs in almost all types of CRISPR-Cas systems, but shows preferences for subtypes of CRISPR-Cas systems that differ across the investigated ecosystems. Taken together, our results shed new light on the diversity of CRISPR spacers in natural microbial communities and provide an explanation for some of the many unmatched spacers in public databases.

Genome Biology and EvolutionVol. 17(11)
Marine Biological Laboratory (US), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US), Joint Genome Institute (US), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Aker BP, Ministerium für Kultur und Wissenschaft des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.