Teaching log data analysis in Indian cybersecurity classrooms: a mixed-methods study of pedagogical challenges and learner difficulties

Introduction Log data analysis is a core competency in cybersecurity education, essential for investigating cyberattacks and identifying their root causes. However, teaching and learning this skill present distinct challenges in resource-constrained contexts such as India. Existing pedagogical approaches often fail to address the dual challenge of limited infrastructure and inadequate student preparation, resulting in persistent gaps between instructional intent and learner outcomes. This study aims to examine these gaps from both faculty and learner perspectives to understand systemic and cognitive barriers in cybersecurity education. Methods A mixed-methods design was adopted to explore pedagogical and cognitive challenges in teaching root cause analysis (RCA) through log data interpretation. First, a survey was administered to cybersecurity faculty members from diverse Indian institutions to identify systemic barriers, including insufficient prerequisite knowledge among students, insufficient infrastructure, and rigid curricula. Complementing this, an empirical study was conducted with undergraduate learners and industry experts. Participants performed RCA on simulated cyberattacks using logfiles and techniques, including the 5 Whys, fault trees, and attack trees. Comparative analysis focused on identifying reasoning patterns and problem-solving strategies across expert and novice groups. Results Survey data revealed consistent concerns among faculty regarding students' inadequate foundational knowledge, infrastructural limitations, and institutional rigidity that constrain pedagogical innovation. In the empirical phase, novice learners exhibited difficulties in technical interpretation, tendencies toward premature analysis termination, and several cognitive biases. In contrast, experts demonstrated structured reasoning, cross-functional integration, and methodical application of RCA techniques, highlighting a pronounced expert-novice divide. Discussion The findings indicate a significant misalignment between instructional objectives and students' preparedness, compounded by systemic institutional constraints. These insights underscore the need for curriculum redesign, targeted teaching strategies, and faculty development initiatives to better scaffold students' analytical reasoning in cybersecurity education. The study contributes to improving pedagogical practices in computing education within underrepresented and resource-limited contexts, offering a pathway to bridge the expert-novice divide in log data analysis training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1676938
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Information and Cyber Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teaching log data analysis in Indian cybersecurity classrooms: a mixed-methods study of pedagogical challenges and learner difficulties

Sridhar Iyer, Syaamantak Das, Priya V. Nagvekar
1 citations
Frontiers in Education
Information and Cyber Security
3.25
article

Teaching log data analysis in Indian cybersecurity classrooms: a mixed-methods study of pedagogical challenges and learner difficulties

Sridhar Iyer, Syaamantak Das, Priya V. Nagvekar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction Log data analysis is a core competency in cybersecurity education, essential for investigating cyberattacks and identifying their root causes. However, teaching and learning this skill present distinct challenges in resource-constrained contexts such as India. Existing pedagogical approaches often fail to address the dual challenge of limited infrastructure and inadequate student preparation, resulting in persistent gaps between instructional intent and learner outcomes. This study aims to examine these gaps from both faculty and learner perspectives to understand systemic and cognitive barriers in cybersecurity education. Methods A mixed-methods design was adopted to explore pedagogical and cognitive challenges in teaching root cause analysis (RCA) through log data interpretation. First, a survey was administered to cybersecurity faculty members from diverse Indian institutions to identify systemic barriers, including insufficient prerequisite knowledge among students, insufficient infrastructure, and rigid curricula. Complementing this, an empirical study was conducted with undergraduate learners and industry experts. Participants performed RCA on simulated cyberattacks using logfiles and techniques, including the 5 Whys, fault trees, and attack trees. Comparative analysis focused on identifying reasoning patterns and problem-solving strategies across expert and novice groups. Results Survey data revealed consistent concerns among faculty regarding students' inadequate foundational knowledge, infrastructural limitations, and institutional rigidity that constrain pedagogical innovation. In the empirical phase, novice learners exhibited difficulties in technical interpretation, tendencies toward premature analysis termination, and several cognitive biases. In contrast, experts demonstrated structured reasoning, cross-functional integration, and methodical application of RCA techniques, highlighting a pronounced expert-novice divide. Discussion The findings indicate a significant misalignment between instructional objectives and students' preparedness, compounded by systemic institutional constraints. These insights underscore the need for curriculum redesign, targeted teaching strategies, and faculty development initiatives to better scaffold students' analytical reasoning in cybersecurity education. The study contributes to improving pedagogical practices in computing education within underrepresented and resource-limited contexts, offering a pathway to bridge the expert-novice divide in log data analysis training.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 10
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Information and Cyber Security
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.