Impact of Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) on Middle School Students’ Writing Outcomes

This study used a randomized, controlled trial to assess the impact of the automated writing evaluation system MI Write on middle school students from traditionally underserved groups, including Black and Hispanic/Latinx students and those experiencing poverty. The research focused on whether students who used MI Write for one school year (n = 1,260) showed improved argumentative writing performance, increased self-efficacy, greater enjoyment of writing, and stronger beliefs in the recursive nature of writing compared with those who did not use MI Write (n = 1,227) . No significant overall treatment effects were found, but significant treatment by district interactions emerged. Perceptions of MI Write were positive overall but varied by district. Findings reveal the limitations and promise of automated writing evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Educational Research Journal
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312251388655
Primary Topic
Writing and Handwriting Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) on Middle School Students’ Writing Outcomes

Joshua Wilson, Tania Cruz Cordero, Fan Zhang, Matthew C. Myers et al.
American Educational Research Journal
Writing and Handwriting Education
article

Impact of Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) on Middle School Students’ Writing Outcomes

Joshua Wilson, Tania Cruz Cordero, Fan Zhang, Matthew C. Myers, Henry May, Andrew Potter, Halley Eacker, Jessica Coles, Corey Palermo
article en

Abstract

This study used a randomized, controlled trial to assess the impact of the automated writing evaluation system MI Write on middle school students from traditionally underserved groups, including Black and Hispanic/Latinx students and those experiencing poverty. The research focused on whether students who used MI Write for one school year (n = 1,260) showed improved argumentative writing performance, increased self-efficacy, greater enjoyment of writing, and stronger beliefs in the recursive nature of writing compared with those who did not use MI Write (n = 1,227) . No significant overall treatment effects were found, but significant treatment by district interactions emerged. Perceptions of MI Write were positive overall but varied by district. Findings reveal the limitations and promise of automated writing evaluation.

American Educational Research JournalVol. 63(1)
Wested (US), University of Delaware (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Writing and Handwriting Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Impact of Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) on Middle School Students’ Writing Outcomes — Joshua Wilson, Tania Cruz Cordero, et al. · American Educational Research Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS