Trends and Myths in U.S. Income Inequality: A Review Essay

Is income inequality in the U.S. increasing or decreasing? In a provocative book, Phil Gramm, Robert Ekelund, and John Early (2022) claim that over the last 40 years, U.S. income inequality has decreased, contrary to Census reports and popular perception. I examine their claim, focusing on challenges of defining income and overcoming data deficiencies in the CPS ASEC. I then compare their estimates of inequality with estimates by the Congressional Budget Office and by developers of so-called distributional national accounts. The authors’ inequality estimates for market income are similar to others, but their inequality estimates for income after transfers and taxes are lower than others and, unlike others, show a decrease in inequality since 1979. The most likely reason is the authors’ inclusion of many small transfer programs not covered by household surveys and thus requiring imputation. Sensitivity analysis would allow better understanding of the effects of imputation assumptions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Economist
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/05694345251393682
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trends and Myths in U.S. Income Inequality: A Review Essay

William M. Boal
1 citations
The American Economist
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
4.20
article

Trends and Myths in U.S. Income Inequality: A Review Essay

William M. Boal
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Is income inequality in the U.S. increasing or decreasing? In a provocative book, Phil Gramm, Robert Ekelund, and John Early (2022) claim that over the last 40 years, U.S. income inequality has decreased, contrary to Census reports and popular perception. I examine their claim, focusing on challenges of defining income and overcoming data deficiencies in the CPS ASEC. I then compare their estimates of inequality with estimates by the Congressional Budget Office and by developers of so-called distributional national accounts. The authors’ inequality estimates for market income are similar to others, but their inequality estimates for income after transfers and taxes are lower than others and, unlike others, show a decrease in inequality since 1979. The most likely reason is the authors’ inclusion of many small transfer programs not covered by household surveys and thus requiring imputation. Sensitivity analysis would allow better understanding of the effects of imputation assumptions.

The American EconomistVol. 71(1)
Drake University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.