Uncertainty estimation of deep learning models for atrial fibrillation detection from Holter recordings: A benchmark study

With the development of deep learning (DL)-based methods, automated atrial fibrillation (AF) detection from electrocardiograms (ECGs) has recently gained much attention. Although the performance of DL has been encouraging, the susceptibility of DL models to overfitting would benefit from the exploration of uncertainty quantification (UQ) to ensure safe integration into clinical practice. However, there has been limited exploration of UQ methods in the context of DL models for AF detection using Holter ECG recordings, and a comprehensive comparison of various UQ techniques remains absent. This study addressed this gap by introducing a benchmark study wherein 11 distinct UQ methods were rigorously evaluated and compared across three public Holter repositories: IRIDIA-AF, Long-Term AF, and MIT-BIH AF datasets. A residual DL model was used for the UQ methods, which is one of the most common architectures in this domain for its ability to capture complex patterns within ECG data. The findings revealed that batch-ensemble (BE) and packed-ensemble (PE) outperformed other UQ methods concerning both performance, as quantified by sensitivity, specificity and expected calibration error, and computational efficiency. In addition, when we implemented reject inference to discard ECG segments where the model confidence was not sufficiently high, BE and PE still showed to reject the least number of samples, while retaining the highest detection performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2025.109032
Primary Topic
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncertainty estimation of deep learning models for atrial fibrillation detection from Holter recordings: A benchmark study

Md Moklesur Rahman, Fabio Badilini, Roberto Sassi, Massimo W. Rivolta
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
article

Uncertainty estimation of deep learning models for atrial fibrillation detection from Holter recordings: A benchmark study

Md Moklesur Rahman, Fabio Badilini, Roberto Sassi, Massimo W. Rivolta
article en

Abstract

With the development of deep learning (DL)-based methods, automated atrial fibrillation (AF) detection from electrocardiograms (ECGs) has recently gained much attention. Although the performance of DL has been encouraging, the susceptibility of DL models to overfitting would benefit from the exploration of uncertainty quantification (UQ) to ensure safe integration into clinical practice. However, there has been limited exploration of UQ methods in the context of DL models for AF detection using Holter ECG recordings, and a comprehensive comparison of various UQ techniques remains absent. This study addressed this gap by introducing a benchmark study wherein 11 distinct UQ methods were rigorously evaluated and compared across three public Holter repositories: IRIDIA-AF, Long-Term AF, and MIT-BIH AF datasets. A residual DL model was used for the UQ methods, which is one of the most common architectures in this domain for its ability to capture complex patterns within ECG data. The findings revealed that batch-ensemble (BE) and packed-ensemble (PE) outperformed other UQ methods concerning both performance, as quantified by sensitivity, specificity and expected calibration error, and computational efficiency. In addition, when we implemented reject inference to discard ECG segments where the model confidence was not sufficiently high, BE and PE still showed to reject the least number of samples, while retaining the highest detection performance.

Biomedical Signal Processing and ControlVol. 113
University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Milan (IT), AMT (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.