“Research Security” in Germany and the United States: Shifting Governance of Scientific Collaboration Under Geopolitical Pressure

ABSTRACT Amid shifting geopolitical tensions, the notion of “research security” has become an increasingly prominent concern in science policy. This paper analyzes how research security is framed and operationalized in Germany and the United States using discourse analysis and securitization theory. The findings show that growing attention to research security does not necessarily imply securitization. Instead, the distinction between ordinary and extraordinary measures—and the role of the target audience—proves crucial in understanding divergent national approaches. The analysis also points to potential cross‐national implications, as tightening research security standards in major national science and higher education systems may influence patterns of international collaboration and policy diffusion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Policy
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70103
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Security and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Research Security” in Germany and the United States: Shifting Governance of Scientific Collaboration Under Geopolitical Pressure

Maximilian Mayer, Nicolas Rüffin, Katharina Cramer, Philip J. Nock
1 citations
Global Policy
Global Security and Public Health
4.20
article

“Research Security” in Germany and the United States: Shifting Governance of Scientific Collaboration Under Geopolitical Pressure

Maximilian Mayer, Nicolas Rüffin, Katharina Cramer, Philip J. Nock
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Amid shifting geopolitical tensions, the notion of “research security” has become an increasingly prominent concern in science policy. This paper analyzes how research security is framed and operationalized in Germany and the United States using discourse analysis and securitization theory. The findings show that growing attention to research security does not necessarily imply securitization. Instead, the distinction between ordinary and extraordinary measures—and the role of the target audience—proves crucial in understanding divergent national approaches. The analysis also points to potential cross‐national implications, as tightening research security standards in major national science and higher education systems may influence patterns of international collaboration and policy diffusion.

Global PolicyVol. 17(1)
Federal Office for Information Security (DE), University of Bonn (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Global Security and Public Health
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“Research Security” in Germany and the United States: Shifting Governance of Scientific Collaboration Under Geopolitical Pressure — Maximilian Mayer, Nicolas Rüffin, et al. · Global Policy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS