Property Rights, Money and the Future of Cryptocurrency

Abstract The central argument in this article is that the legal recognition of cryptocurrency as a distinct form of property directly influences, and is in turn influenced by, its capacity to function as a medium of exchange. Legal scholarship often treats these topics in isolation. The analysis examines the conceptual and juridical foundations of cryptocurrency through the dual prisms of property and money, arguing that the legitimacy of cryptocurrency in economic and legal systems depends on its status as an object of ownership. It contends that the use of cryptocurrency as money cannot be separated from its proprietary character, as the ability to hold, transfer, and exclude others forms the basis upon which trust, exchange, and value are established. The discussion advances the view that cryptocurrency represents a novel category of intangible asset whose ownership must be understood within established principles of personal property while accommodating its decentralised, non-sovereign nature. The article further contends that cryptocurrency as a form of property enables it to fulfil specific monetary roles as a store of value and medium of exchange, thereby bringing personal property and money into a single analytical frame.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Digital Law and Governance
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/ijdlg-2025-0011
Primary Topic
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Property Rights, Money and the Future of Cryptocurrency

Iyare Otabor‐Olubor
International Journal of Digital Law and Governance
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
article

Property Rights, Money and the Future of Cryptocurrency

Iyare Otabor‐Olubor
article en

Abstract

Abstract The central argument in this article is that the legal recognition of cryptocurrency as a distinct form of property directly influences, and is in turn influenced by, its capacity to function as a medium of exchange. Legal scholarship often treats these topics in isolation. The analysis examines the conceptual and juridical foundations of cryptocurrency through the dual prisms of property and money, arguing that the legitimacy of cryptocurrency in economic and legal systems depends on its status as an object of ownership. It contends that the use of cryptocurrency as money cannot be separated from its proprietary character, as the ability to hold, transfer, and exclude others forms the basis upon which trust, exchange, and value are established. The discussion advances the view that cryptocurrency represents a novel category of intangible asset whose ownership must be understood within established principles of personal property while accommodating its decentralised, non-sovereign nature. The article further contends that cryptocurrency as a form of property enables it to fulfil specific monetary roles as a store of value and medium of exchange, thereby bringing personal property and money into a single analytical frame.

International Journal of Digital Law and GovernanceVol. 2(2)
Aston University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.