The Resist US Aggression and Aid Korea Campaign in Rural China and the Formation of Patriotic Production Ideology – From “Getting Rich” to “Patriotism” in Rural Production –

This study examines how patriotism during the Resist US Aggression and Aid Korea campaign evolved from a mere instrument of mass mobilization into a central rationale for the voluntary participation of the populace in economic construction during the Mao era. It traces how the ideology of patriotism—rooted in the principles of Resist America, Aid Korea—developed into the practice encapsulated in the slogan “production is patriotism,” analyzing its underlying logic, trajectory, and internalization among peasants, as well as its subsequent impact on rural society in Maoist China. Drawing on Zhongguo Nongbao, a newspaper launched in May 1950 for the education and propaganda of rural cadres and peasants and published until 1965, the study explores the concrete processes through which patriotic education, propaganda, pledges, and Fengchan campaigns unfolded in the countryside as part of the “patriotic production movement.”<br/> Under the exceptional conditions of war, the concept of “patriotic production,” grounded in the logic of aiding one’s family and brothers, became entrenched as an ideology within the state-capitalist system of production mobilization, consistently demanding diligence and the attainment of production targets from peasants. The earlier logic of rural production for individual benefit—expressed in the slogan “develop production and improve livelihood”—was replaced by “patriotic production for defending the nation”, which soon expanded into a normative framework for “repaying the grace” of the Chinese Communist Party. Through repeated patriotic education and propaganda, peasants came to willingly dedicate their labor to present production for the sake of future prosperity, fostering a transformation distinct from that brought about by land reform.<br/> By illuminating these processes, this study offers important insights into the changing consciousness of the rural masses during the Mao era and provides a basis for understanding production campaigns such as the Great Leap Forward. It further underscores the historical significance of patriotic production during the Korean War period by situating it within the broader context of subsequent rural production drives and state-led economic mobilization.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Studies of Modern Chinese History
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29323/mchina.2025.9.107.121
Primary Topic
Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Resist US Aggression and Aid Korea Campaign in Rural China and the Formation of Patriotic Production Ideology – From “Getting Rich” to “Patriotism” in Rural Production –

Seung A Lee
Korean Studies of Modern Chinese History
Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
article

The Resist US Aggression and Aid Korea Campaign in Rural China and the Formation of Patriotic Production Ideology – From “Getting Rich” to “Patriotism” in Rural Production –

Seung A Lee
article en

Abstract

This study examines how patriotism during the Resist US Aggression and Aid Korea campaign evolved from a mere instrument of mass mobilization into a central rationale for the voluntary participation of the populace in economic construction during the Mao era. It traces how the ideology of patriotism—rooted in the principles of Resist America, Aid Korea—developed into the practice encapsulated in the slogan “production is patriotism,” analyzing its underlying logic, trajectory, and internalization among peasants, as well as its subsequent impact on rural society in Maoist China. Drawing on Zhongguo Nongbao, a newspaper launched in May 1950 for the education and propaganda of rural cadres and peasants and published until 1965, the study explores the concrete processes through which patriotic education, propaganda, pledges, and Fengchan campaigns unfolded in the countryside as part of the “patriotic production movement.”<br/> Under the exceptional conditions of war, the concept of “patriotic production,” grounded in the logic of aiding one’s family and brothers, became entrenched as an ideology within the state-capitalist system of production mobilization, consistently demanding diligence and the attainment of production targets from peasants. The earlier logic of rural production for individual benefit—expressed in the slogan “develop production and improve livelihood”—was replaced by “patriotic production for defending the nation”, which soon expanded into a normative framework for “repaying the grace” of the Chinese Communist Party. Through repeated patriotic education and propaganda, peasants came to willingly dedicate their labor to present production for the sake of future prosperity, fostering a transformation distinct from that brought about by land reform.<br/> By illuminating these processes, this study offers important insights into the changing consciousness of the rural masses during the Mao era and provides a basis for understanding production campaigns such as the Great Leap Forward. It further underscores the historical significance of patriotic production during the Korean War period by situating it within the broader context of subsequent rural production drives and state-led economic mobilization.

Korean Studies of Modern Chinese HistoryVol. 107
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.