Influence of Topic Familiarity and Prompt Specificity on Citation Fabrication in Mental Health Research Using Large Language Models: Experimental Study
Citation fabrication and bibliographic errors remain common in GPT-4o outputs, with nearly two-thirds of citations being fabricated or inaccurate. Reliability systematically varied by disorder familiarity and prompt specificity, with greater risks in less visible or specialized mental health topics. These findings highlight the need for careful prompt design, rigorous human verification of all model-generated references, and stronger journal and institutional safeguards to protect research integrity as LLMs are integrated into academic practice.
Authors
- Jake Linardon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4475-7139)
- Zoe McClure (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3926-8058)
- Cleo Anderson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1203-5492)
- Hannah K. Jarman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8225-4511)
- Claudia Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1359-2394)
- Mariel Messer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7186-7264)
Institutions
- Deakin University (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- JMIR Mental Health
- Published
- 2025-11-12
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.2196/80371
- Citations
- 7
- Primary Topic
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 9.79