Experiences of members of community-based, environmentally focused groups following the 2019–20 bushfires

The 2019–20 summer bushfires in Australia resulted in significant loss and damage across Australia. This article focuses on the experiences of community-based, environmentally focused groups in the East Gippsland and northeast regions of Victoria after the fires. Qualitative interviews with 21 group members and a focus group with 12 industry stakeholders were undertaken. We identified that despite disaster recovery not being a core function of these groups, they had recovery related benefits in post-disaster settings. This included supporting connection to the natural environment, benefits of group membership that aligned with the mass trauma intervention principles, and the ability to help amplify the work of government and other organisations. The findings from this study indicate that community-based, environmentally focused groups can positively contribute to both social and environmental recovery after disasters such as bushfires.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Emergency Management
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47389/40.4.39
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experiences of members of community-based, environmentally focused groups following the 2019–20 bushfires

Kate Brady, Lisa Gibbs, Greg Foliente, Robyn Molyneaux et al.
Australian Journal of Emergency Management
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

Experiences of members of community-based, environmentally focused groups following the 2019–20 bushfires

Kate Brady, Lisa Gibbs, Greg Foliente, Robyn Molyneaux, Wendy Wright
article en

Abstract

The 2019–20 summer bushfires in Australia resulted in significant loss and damage across Australia. This article focuses on the experiences of community-based, environmentally focused groups in the East Gippsland and northeast regions of Victoria after the fires. Qualitative interviews with 21 group members and a focus group with 12 industry stakeholders were undertaken. We identified that despite disaster recovery not being a core function of these groups, they had recovery related benefits in post-disaster settings. This included supporting connection to the natural environment, benefits of group membership that aligned with the mass trauma intervention principles, and the ability to help amplify the work of government and other organisations. The findings from this study indicate that community-based, environmentally focused groups can positively contribute to both social and environmental recovery after disasters such as bushfires.

Australian Journal of Emergency ManagementVol. 10.47389/40(No 3)
Federation University (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Australian Red Cross Lifeblood (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.