Improving data quality and privacy in AI systems used for employee data processing

High-quality data is crucial for the ethical and effective use of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly in the employment context. This paper critically examines global legal frameworks demanding accuracy, fairness and accountability in AI data usage. Analysing key legislation including the European Union (EU) Artificial Intelligence AI Act (AI Act), US federal actions, Japan’s Act on Protection of Personal Information (APPI) and China’s Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL), it highlights international consensus and geopolitical divergences. Recognising limitations in privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs), the authors propose ‘subjective anonymisation’ — a novel, context-sensitive method protecting individual privacy while preserving data utility. The paper argues for dynamic, risk-based data governance as both a compliance strategy and foundation for ethical AI innovation. This article is also included in The Business & Management Collection which can be accessed at https://hstalks.com/business/.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of data protection & privacy.
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69554/cvez5008
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving data quality and privacy in AI systems used for employee data processing

Noémie Weinbaum, Roy Kamp
Journal of data protection & privacy.
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Improving data quality and privacy in AI systems used for employee data processing

Noémie Weinbaum, Roy Kamp
article en

Abstract

High-quality data is crucial for the ethical and effective use of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly in the employment context. This paper critically examines global legal frameworks demanding accuracy, fairness and accountability in AI data usage. Analysing key legislation including the European Union (EU) Artificial Intelligence AI Act (AI Act), US federal actions, Japan’s Act on Protection of Personal Information (APPI) and China’s Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL), it highlights international consensus and geopolitical divergences. Recognising limitations in privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs), the authors propose ‘subjective anonymisation’ — a novel, context-sensitive method protecting individual privacy while preserving data utility. The paper argues for dynamic, risk-based data governance as both a compliance strategy and foundation for ethical AI innovation. This article is also included in The Business & Management Collection which can be accessed at https://hstalks.com/business/.

Journal of data protection & privacy.Vol. 8(2)
Boehringer Ingelheim (South Korea) (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.