Digital Chrono-epistemology, or Artificial Intelligence from Instrument to Institution

For Deleuze, an institution is a procedure of satisfaction, or the human development of artificial means to achieve that satisfaction. Importantly, the reason for the ‘specific’ human prerogative over this instituting procedure lies in the possibility of indecision which characterises human cognition, a possibility which leaves space (and time) for intelligence to pre-empt, prevent and plan. Generally speaking, artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms are today strongly influencing the human institutions which have preceded and will likely outlive them. Yet, it is possible to conceive, together with the question of algorithms and institutions, a parallel definition of algorithms as institutions. If to institute means to organise the means into a world, the instrumental vision of AI as an organising tool can be replaced with the idea of AI as an autonomous instituting entity whose operational velocity is increasingly and variously intervening on human organisations, introducing its own ‘digital chrono-epistemology’, or its own temporal frame, to the world.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Deleuze and Guattari Studies
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3366/dlgs.2025.0618
Primary Topic
Digital Education and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital Chrono-epistemology, or Artificial Intelligence from Instrument to Institution

Stamatia Portanova
Deleuze and Guattari Studies
Digital Education and Society
article

Digital Chrono-epistemology, or Artificial Intelligence from Instrument to Institution

Stamatia Portanova
article en

Abstract

For Deleuze, an institution is a procedure of satisfaction, or the human development of artificial means to achieve that satisfaction. Importantly, the reason for the ‘specific’ human prerogative over this instituting procedure lies in the possibility of indecision which characterises human cognition, a possibility which leaves space (and time) for intelligence to pre-empt, prevent and plan. Generally speaking, artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms are today strongly influencing the human institutions which have preceded and will likely outlive them. Yet, it is possible to conceive, together with the question of algorithms and institutions, a parallel definition of algorithms as institutions. If to institute means to organise the means into a world, the instrumental vision of AI as an organising tool can be replaced with the idea of AI as an autonomous instituting entity whose operational velocity is increasingly and variously intervening on human organisations, introducing its own ‘digital chrono-epistemology’, or its own temporal frame, to the world.

Deleuze and Guattari StudiesVol. 19(4)
University of Naples - L'Orientale (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Digital Education and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Digital Chrono-epistemology, or Artificial Intelligence from Instrument to Institution — Stamatia Portanova · Deleuze and Guattari Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS