Data Privacy Dominance: An Empirical Investigation into Nigerian Postgraduate Students' Prioritization of AI Ethical Concerns in Higher Education

Abstract – The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) promises significant pedagogical and administrative efficiencies, yet it concurrently introduces profound ethical dilemmas, particularly in data-rich environments. The study empirically investigates the prioritization of major AI ethical concerns—Data Privacy, Algorithmic Bias/Fairness, Transparency, and Accountability—among Nigerian postgraduate students. Utilizing a quantitative survey with 300 strategically selected postgraduate students across 2 federal universities and 2 state universities, data were collected using a structured questionnaire. The study, anchored in the Ethical Data Governance Framework (EDGF), addressed the question of what the major ethical concerns are and tested two null hypotheses on the significant differences in awareness and the prioritization of these concerns. Descriptive statistics, non-parametric Friedman Test, and Independent Samples t-test were employed for analyses. Although the findings revealed a high level of overall awareness regarding AI ethical implications (X̄ = 3.12), there is a significant difference in the awareness of ethical implications between students who have encountered AI applications (X̄ = 3.29) and those who have not (X̄ = 2.65). The Friedman Test and Independent Samples t-test unequivocally demonstrated a significant statistical difference in prioritization (Friedman, X2 = 12.34, p-value < 0.05; t-value of 4.10, p-value < 0.05), leading to the rejection of HO2. Data Privacy emerged as the overwhelmingly dominant ethical concern with a Weighted Mean Score (WMS) = 3.55, followed by Transparency (WMS = 3.38), reflecting a deep-seated trust deficit in institutional data stewardship and a strong student demand for Explainable AI (XAI). Students who have encountered AI applications demonstrated significantly higher awareness (X̄ = 3.29) and significantly higher overall prioritization (X̄ = 3.33) of ethical concerns compared to those who have not. This paper recommends that Nigerian HEIs must urgently adopt the EDGF principles by implementing stringent data privacy and transparency protocols with robust procedural tools to address data protection and enforce algorithmic accountability. This should be coupled with experiential AI training to foster trust and ensure the responsible adoption of AI in Nigerian higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51583/ijltemas.2025.1410000088
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data Privacy Dominance: An Empirical Investigation into Nigerian Postgraduate Students' Prioritization of AI Ethical Concerns in Higher Education

S.A. Adedokun, Stella Kehinde Ogunkan, Olufunke Kemi Ogunniyi, Dorcas Atinuke Adedokun
2 citations
International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
article

Data Privacy Dominance: An Empirical Investigation into Nigerian Postgraduate Students' Prioritization of AI Ethical Concerns in Higher Education

S.A. Adedokun, Stella Kehinde Ogunkan, Olufunke Kemi Ogunniyi, Dorcas Atinuke Adedokun
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract – The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) promises significant pedagogical and administrative efficiencies, yet it concurrently introduces profound ethical dilemmas, particularly in data-rich environments. The study empirically investigates the prioritization of major AI ethical concerns—Data Privacy, Algorithmic Bias/Fairness, Transparency, and Accountability—among Nigerian postgraduate students. Utilizing a quantitative survey with 300 strategically selected postgraduate students across 2 federal universities and 2 state universities, data were collected using a structured questionnaire. The study, anchored in the Ethical Data Governance Framework (EDGF), addressed the question of what the major ethical concerns are and tested two null hypotheses on the significant differences in awareness and the prioritization of these concerns. Descriptive statistics, non-parametric Friedman Test, and Independent Samples t-test were employed for analyses. Although the findings revealed a high level of overall awareness regarding AI ethical implications (X̄ = 3.12), there is a significant difference in the awareness of ethical implications between students who have encountered AI applications (X̄ = 3.29) and those who have not (X̄ = 2.65). The Friedman Test and Independent Samples t-test unequivocally demonstrated a significant statistical difference in prioritization (Friedman, X2 = 12.34, p-value < 0.05; t-value of 4.10, p-value < 0.05), leading to the rejection of HO2. Data Privacy emerged as the overwhelmingly dominant ethical concern with a Weighted Mean Score (WMS) = 3.55, followed by Transparency (WMS = 3.38), reflecting a deep-seated trust deficit in institutional data stewardship and a strong student demand for Explainable AI (XAI). Students who have encountered AI applications demonstrated significantly higher awareness (X̄ = 3.29) and significantly higher overall prioritization (X̄ = 3.33) of ethical concerns compared to those who have not. This paper recommends that Nigerian HEIs must urgently adopt the EDGF principles by implementing stringent data privacy and transparency protocols with robust procedural tools to address data protection and enforce algorithmic accountability. This should be coupled with experiential AI training to foster trust and ensure the responsible adoption of AI in Nigerian higher education.

International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied ScienceVol. 14(10)
Ladoke Akintola University of Technology (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.