Dynamical dark energy in models with an evolution close to <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>CDM</mml:mi> </mml:math>
In this communication, we address whether or not there is an equivalence between the kinematical and dynamical descriptions of the spatially flat $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}$ model. We address this by investigating whether an almost $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}$ expansion history [$j(z)\ensuremath{\approx}1$] corresponds to an almost $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}$ model [${w}_{\mathrm{DE}}(z)\ensuremath{\approx}\ensuremath{-}1$] by considering two particular explicit examples. At least for the cases considered, this turns out not to be the case. Instead, what we find is that an almost $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}$ cosmic evolution rather corresponds to an almost unified dark-fluid model. Considering that one never gets the exact condition $j(z)=1$ from any cosmographic datasets, this raises further questions on whether the $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}$ model is the best candidate for the standard model of the evolution of the Universe.
Authors
- Saikat Chakraborty (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5472-304X)
- Kelly MacDevette (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3465-8631)
- Álvaro de la Cruz-Dombriz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7072-9396)
- Peter K. S. Dunsby (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6271-9585)
- Charlotte Louw (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7835-9631)
Institutions
- University of Cape Town (ZA)
- Chulalongkorn University (TH)
- Universidad de Salamanca (ES)
- North-West University (ZA)
- South African Radio Astronomy Observatory (ZA)
- Astronomical Observatory (RS)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
- Published
- 2025-11-12
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1103/57rv-kvm6
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.31