Supporting the Next Generation of Global Environmental Politics Research: A Call to Dialogue and Action

Abstract As the journal Global Environmental Politics reflects on the past twenty-five years and looks forward, taking stock of early-career researcher (ECR) perspectives is a critical exercise for ensuring that the journal and the field of global environmental politics remain healthy and productive. In this article, we incorporate insights generated through focus groups and surveys from fifty-one ECRs from around the world to explore, first, where ECRs think global environmental politics is headed; second, ECRs’ visions and hopes for the future of global environmental politics research; and third, what structural components (training, job market, disciplinary organizations) are necessary to support ECRs in producing the next generation of environmental politics research. Exploring these questions, we propose a start to a “next-generation research strategy,” focused on how global environmental politics scholars should be researching empirical topics. We conclude by addressing the challenges ECRs face in implementing this strategy and how institutions—including associations, journals, and training programs—can support ECRs in this endeavor.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Environmental Politics
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.a.699
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Transboundary Water Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supporting the Next Generation of Global Environmental Politics Research: A Call to Dialogue and Action

Thaís Ribeiro, Devon Cantwell-Chavez, Emma Lecavalier, Janina Grabs et al.
1 citations
Global Environmental Politics
Transboundary Water Resource Management
4.20
article

Supporting the Next Generation of Global Environmental Politics Research: A Call to Dialogue and Action

Thaís Ribeiro, Devon Cantwell-Chavez, Emma Lecavalier, Janina Grabs, Marielle Papin, Justin Alger, Dhanasree Jayaram
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract As the journal Global Environmental Politics reflects on the past twenty-five years and looks forward, taking stock of early-career researcher (ECR) perspectives is a critical exercise for ensuring that the journal and the field of global environmental politics remain healthy and productive. In this article, we incorporate insights generated through focus groups and surveys from fifty-one ECRs from around the world to explore, first, where ECRs think global environmental politics is headed; second, ECRs’ visions and hopes for the future of global environmental politics research; and third, what structural components (training, job market, disciplinary organizations) are necessary to support ECRs in producing the next generation of environmental politics research. Exploring these questions, we propose a start to a “next-generation research strategy,” focused on how global environmental politics scholars should be researching empirical topics. We conclude by addressing the challenges ECRs face in implementing this strategy and how institutions—including associations, journals, and training programs—can support ECRs in this endeavor.

Global Environmental PoliticsVol. 26(1)
Medical Protective (US), Schlumberger (Ireland) (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Transboundary Water Resource Management
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.