Exposure to clinical decision support and training increases primary care clinician confidence in managing cognitive impairment care but not confidence to diagnose

Cognitive impairment (CI) is projected to significantly increase as the population ages. While primary care clinicians are often the first point of contact for patients with cognitive decline, many clinicians report significant barriers to addressing CI in primary care, including lack of time, lack of established workflow, and low confidence in diagnosing and managing CI. To address these barriers, a CI clinician decision support system (CI-CDSS) was developed and is being tested in a cluster randomized, controlled clinical trial in 38 primary care clinics. A secondary aim of the study was to assess whether the CI-CDSS increased clinician confidence in CI diagnosis and management, as measured by surveys administered before and 8-months after CI-CDSS implementation. Primary outcome results of CI diagnosis are awaiting the end of the follow-up period; however, clinician surveys are complete and reported here. The odds ratio (OR) for the interaction between survey time and study arm, estimated in a generalized linear mixed model, tested the significance of change in clinician confidence across study arms. The average marginal effect (AME), estimated in a generalized estimating equation, provided a treatment effect estimate. While self-reported use of the CI-CDSS was modest (32% remembered the tool and 65% of those used it), those who used it reported high satisfaction (97% said the tool helped provide better CI care). Clinicians in CI-CDSS clinics reported increased confidence in managing CI care relative to usual care (UC) clinicians (AME = 16.8, OR = 2.24 [1.05, 4.80]). Trending, but not significant, increases in clinician confidence in diagnosing CI were observed in CI-CDSS clinics when compared to usual care (e.g., distinguishing types of dementia AME = 9.8, OR = 2.08[0.84, 5.14]). The results of this study demonstrate the potential value of a CI-CDSS in promoting primary care clinician confidence in caring for and diagnosing patients with CI. This trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05723523 on 02/02/2023.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Primary Care
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-03053-z
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exposure to clinical decision support and training increases primary care clinician confidence in managing cognitive impairment care but not confidence to diagnose

S.K. Gustafson, Soo Borson B, Rebecca C. Rossom, Meghan M. JaKa et al.
BMC Primary Care
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Exposure to clinical decision support and training increases primary care clinician confidence in managing cognitive impairment care but not confidence to diagnose

S.K. Gustafson, Soo Borson B, Rebecca C. Rossom, Meghan M. JaKa, Leah R. Hanson, Ann M. Werner, Patrick J. O’Connor, A. Lauren Crain, Bethany Crouse, Heidi L. Ekstrom, Laura J Zibley, D. Appana, T. L. Sternberg
article en

Abstract

Cognitive impairment (CI) is projected to significantly increase as the population ages. While primary care clinicians are often the first point of contact for patients with cognitive decline, many clinicians report significant barriers to addressing CI in primary care, including lack of time, lack of established workflow, and low confidence in diagnosing and managing CI. To address these barriers, a CI clinician decision support system (CI-CDSS) was developed and is being tested in a cluster randomized, controlled clinical trial in 38 primary care clinics. A secondary aim of the study was to assess whether the CI-CDSS increased clinician confidence in CI diagnosis and management, as measured by surveys administered before and 8-months after CI-CDSS implementation. Primary outcome results of CI diagnosis are awaiting the end of the follow-up period; however, clinician surveys are complete and reported here. The odds ratio (OR) for the interaction between survey time and study arm, estimated in a generalized linear mixed model, tested the significance of change in clinician confidence across study arms. The average marginal effect (AME), estimated in a generalized estimating equation, provided a treatment effect estimate. While self-reported use of the CI-CDSS was modest (32% remembered the tool and 65% of those used it), those who used it reported high satisfaction (97% said the tool helped provide better CI care). Clinicians in CI-CDSS clinics reported increased confidence in managing CI care relative to usual care (UC) clinicians (AME = 16.8, OR = 2.24 [1.05, 4.80]). Trending, but not significant, increases in clinician confidence in diagnosing CI were observed in CI-CDSS clinics when compared to usual care (e.g., distinguishing types of dementia AME = 9.8, OR = 2.08[0.84, 5.14]). The results of this study demonstrate the potential value of a CI-CDSS in promoting primary care clinician confidence in caring for and diagnosing patients with CI. This trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05723523 on 02/02/2023.

BMC Primary CareVol. 26(1)
Keck Hospital of USC (US), HealthPartners (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.