Ambassador-host country relations: Comparing the digital diplomacy strategies of the Chinese and US ambassadors on X

Heightened geopolitical tensions give rise to digital diplomacy scholarship that frames social media as a digital battleground where rival states amply diplomatic messaging. Yet, interactions between ambassadors and host countries amidst geopolitical tensions remain underexplored. This study used mixed methods to analyze the 2022–2023 X posts of China’s ambassadors in Washington, DC, and their US counterpart in Beijing. Computational analysis reveals different sentiment curves and diplomatic priorities on ambassadorial accounts. Qualitative interpretation reveals that ambassadors were positive on topics of bilateral cooperation, interaction and historical connections. Whereas Chinese ambassadors were critical of the US on Taiwan and human rights, the US ambassador was negative on China’s human rights, geopolitical actions and censorship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Media and Communication
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17427665251386748
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ambassador-host country relations: Comparing the digital diplomacy strategies of the Chinese and US ambassadors on X

Keyu Alexander Chen
Global Media and Communication
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
article

Ambassador-host country relations: Comparing the digital diplomacy strategies of the Chinese and US ambassadors on X

Keyu Alexander Chen
article en

Abstract

Heightened geopolitical tensions give rise to digital diplomacy scholarship that frames social media as a digital battleground where rival states amply diplomatic messaging. Yet, interactions between ambassadors and host countries amidst geopolitical tensions remain underexplored. This study used mixed methods to analyze the 2022–2023 X posts of China’s ambassadors in Washington, DC, and their US counterpart in Beijing. Computational analysis reveals different sentiment curves and diplomatic priorities on ambassadorial accounts. Qualitative interpretation reveals that ambassadors were positive on topics of bilateral cooperation, interaction and historical connections. Whereas Chinese ambassadors were critical of the US on Taiwan and human rights, the US ambassador was negative on China’s human rights, geopolitical actions and censorship.

Global Media and CommunicationVol. 21(3)
Georgia State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ambassador-host country relations: Comparing the digital diplomacy strategies of the Chinese and US ambassadors on X — Keyu Alexander Chen · Global Media and Communication (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS