Hinge commitments: the restrictive reading

Wittgenstein’s posthumously published work, On Certainty, has had a radical effect on contemporary epistemology. Since this text is composed of four notebooks that Wittgenstein wrote just before he died, and hence had no opportunity to edit, it is natural to suppose that the idea of a definitive overarching reading of this work that is supported by the text is chimerical. I want to propose, however, that a close reading of these notebooks reveals that this is not the case. In fact, I want to argue that Wittgenstein is progressively closing in on a particular account of the special kind of hinge certainty—what I call hinge commitment—that interested him, and which plays a framework role in our system of rational evaluation. Crucial to this interpretation is the idea that many of the certainties that Wittgenstein discusses in On Certainty are not hinge commitments. Accordingly, I call this account the restrictive reading.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Synthese
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-025-05328-5
Primary Topic
Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hinge commitments: the restrictive reading

Duncan Pritchard
Synthese
Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
article

Hinge commitments: the restrictive reading

Duncan Pritchard
article en

Abstract

Wittgenstein’s posthumously published work, On Certainty, has had a radical effect on contemporary epistemology. Since this text is composed of four notebooks that Wittgenstein wrote just before he died, and hence had no opportunity to edit, it is natural to suppose that the idea of a definitive overarching reading of this work that is supported by the text is chimerical. I want to propose, however, that a close reading of these notebooks reveals that this is not the case. In fact, I want to argue that Wittgenstein is progressively closing in on a particular account of the special kind of hinge certainty—what I call hinge commitment—that interested him, and which plays a framework role in our system of rational evaluation. Crucial to this interpretation is the idea that many of the certainties that Wittgenstein discusses in On Certainty are not hinge commitments. Accordingly, I call this account the restrictive reading.

SyntheseVol. 206(5)
University of California, Irvine (US)
University of Johannesburg
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Hinge commitments: the restrictive reading — Duncan Pritchard · Synthese (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS