Framework for Assessing Sustainability in Industry 4.0: Supply Chain Optimization, Manufacturing Processes, and Energy Consumption Reduction

Decision making has uncertainty problems in evaluation process, so to overcome uncertainty existing fuzzy decision-making approaches, the neutrosophic set is used to solve incomplete data. Interval valued neutrosophic numbers (IVNNs) are used in this study to solve uncertainty problems. The IVNNs are used with the multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods. MCDM method is used to deal with different criteria and alternatives. This study proposes an MCDM methodology for assessment sustainability in industry 4.0. Twenty cases and ten alternatives are used in this study. The criteria weights are computed using the average method. The alternatives are ranked using the ARAS method. Application is shown to show the validation of the proposed approach. Sensitivity analysis is conducted in this study to show the stability of the ranks. The results show the ranks of alternatives are stable under 20 different cases.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Machine Intelligence Journal
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63689/3005-3617.1067
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Framework for Assessing Sustainability in Industry 4.0: Supply Chain Optimization, Manufacturing Processes, and Energy Consumption Reduction

Nebojša Bačanin, Mohamed Abouhawwash
Sustainable Machine Intelligence Journal
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

Framework for Assessing Sustainability in Industry 4.0: Supply Chain Optimization, Manufacturing Processes, and Energy Consumption Reduction

Nebojša Bačanin, Mohamed Abouhawwash
article en

Abstract

Decision making has uncertainty problems in evaluation process, so to overcome uncertainty existing fuzzy decision-making approaches, the neutrosophic set is used to solve incomplete data. Interval valued neutrosophic numbers (IVNNs) are used in this study to solve uncertainty problems. The IVNNs are used with the multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods. MCDM method is used to deal with different criteria and alternatives. This study proposes an MCDM methodology for assessment sustainability in industry 4.0. Twenty cases and ten alternatives are used in this study. The criteria weights are computed using the average method. The alternatives are ranked using the ARAS method. Application is shown to show the validation of the proposed approach. Sensitivity analysis is conducted in this study to show the stability of the ranks. The results show the ranks of alternatives are stable under 20 different cases.

Sustainable Machine Intelligence JournalVol. 12(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.