Data quality, provenance and transparency in real-world data : Aligning quality standards with data governance legal frameworks

There have been numerous papers discussing data quality and data protection independently, but there has been little discussion on how data quality relates to data protection and other data governance regulatory frameworks. This paper is a step towards addressing that gap and makes the case for why data quality is relevant for data protection and legal compliance professionals. Real-world data in the context of healthcare refers to data that is routinely collected in the course of delivering healthcare. From a data protection regulatory perspective, Article 5 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) lists data accuracy as one of the principles for data processing. The recently adopted European Union Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act) Article 10 outlines requirements for data and data governance, specifically quality criteria for datasets used to train, test and validate high-risk AI models to address concerns around algorithmic bias due to biases in the training data. The Standards for Data Diversity, Inclusivity and Generalisability (STANDING) Together consensus recommendations for dataset curators on transparency in dataset documentation enable an informed assessment of the suitability of data and examination of biases, for development of AI health technologies. This includes information on data provenance, modifications, sociodemographic composition and bias assessment findings. The Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) database is used to illustrate how these recommendations can be implemented in a practical way using unique identifiers such as digital object identifiers (DOIs), metadata, published data resource profiles with sociodemographic information and data quality assessments using validation and comparability studies. There is considerable alignment between established scientific standards, medical product regulatory and data governance legal requirements on data quality, as well as emerging international consensus which will reduce the compliance burden on curators and users of real-world data. This article is also included in The Business & Management Collection which can be accessed at https://hstalks.com/business/.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of data protection & privacy.
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69554/pggw3813
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Data Quality and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data quality, provenance and transparency in real-world data : Aligning quality standards with data governance legal frameworks

Eleanor L. Axson, Colin Mitchell, Puja Myles
1 citations
Journal of data protection & privacy.
Data Quality and Management
2.11
article

Data quality, provenance and transparency in real-world data : Aligning quality standards with data governance legal frameworks

Eleanor L. Axson, Colin Mitchell, Puja Myles
article en
1 citations

Abstract

There have been numerous papers discussing data quality and data protection independently, but there has been little discussion on how data quality relates to data protection and other data governance regulatory frameworks. This paper is a step towards addressing that gap and makes the case for why data quality is relevant for data protection and legal compliance professionals. Real-world data in the context of healthcare refers to data that is routinely collected in the course of delivering healthcare. From a data protection regulatory perspective, Article 5 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) lists data accuracy as one of the principles for data processing. The recently adopted European Union Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act) Article 10 outlines requirements for data and data governance, specifically quality criteria for datasets used to train, test and validate high-risk AI models to address concerns around algorithmic bias due to biases in the training data. The Standards for Data Diversity, Inclusivity and Generalisability (STANDING) Together consensus recommendations for dataset curators on transparency in dataset documentation enable an informed assessment of the suitability of data and examination of biases, for development of AI health technologies. This includes information on data provenance, modifications, sociodemographic composition and bias assessment findings. The Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) database is used to illustrate how these recommendations can be implemented in a practical way using unique identifiers such as digital object identifiers (DOIs), metadata, published data resource profiles with sociodemographic information and data quality assessments using validation and comparability studies. There is considerable alignment between established scientific standards, medical product regulatory and data governance legal requirements on data quality, as well as emerging international consensus which will reduce the compliance burden on curators and users of real-world data. This article is also included in The Business & Management Collection which can be accessed at https://hstalks.com/business/.

Journal of data protection & privacy.Vol. 8(2)
PHG Foundation (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Data Quality and Management
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.