Informing Large-Scale Emergent Decarceration Efforts: Validation of the Reduction in Capacity Evaluation (ReduCE)

Large-scale emergent decarceration efforts introduce challenges for time and resources that prohibit jurisdictions from employing best practices in release decisions. Best practice includes a structured professional judgment approach by paroling authorities to incorporate group-level predicted risk and individual-level assessment of current risk and suitability for release. Absent the ability to expand parole review, jurisdictions should ensure decisions are informed by risk assessment that incorporates recent behavior and potential mitigating factors to approximate parole practice. The Reduction in Capacity Evaluation (ReduCE) was created for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation following COVID-19 to inform prison population reduction efforts wherein empirically supported structured decision-making used by the Board of Parole Hearings cannot be employed. ReduCE is automatically scored, differentiates between lower risk groups, predicts any new return ( AUC = .69) and new felony return ( AUC = .75) across gender and race, and informs risk over and above the existing static instrument.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Criminal Justice and Behavior
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548251389465
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Informing Large-Scale Emergent Decarceration Efforts: Validation of the Reduction in Capacity Evaluation (ReduCE)

Ralph C. Serin, Danielle J. Rieger, Shelley L. Brown
1 citations
Criminal Justice and Behavior
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
4.20
article

Informing Large-Scale Emergent Decarceration Efforts: Validation of the Reduction in Capacity Evaluation (ReduCE)

Ralph C. Serin, Danielle J. Rieger, Shelley L. Brown
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Large-scale emergent decarceration efforts introduce challenges for time and resources that prohibit jurisdictions from employing best practices in release decisions. Best practice includes a structured professional judgment approach by paroling authorities to incorporate group-level predicted risk and individual-level assessment of current risk and suitability for release. Absent the ability to expand parole review, jurisdictions should ensure decisions are informed by risk assessment that incorporates recent behavior and potential mitigating factors to approximate parole practice. The Reduction in Capacity Evaluation (ReduCE) was created for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation following COVID-19 to inform prison population reduction efforts wherein empirically supported structured decision-making used by the Board of Parole Hearings cannot be employed. ReduCE is automatically scored, differentiates between lower risk groups, predicts any new return ( AUC = .69) and new felony return ( AUC = .75) across gender and race, and informs risk over and above the existing static instrument.

Criminal Justice and BehaviorVol. 53(4)
Carleton University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.