Value of Additional Systematic Cores During Magnetic Resonance Imaging–guided Targeted Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Screening for Young Men: Results from the PROBASE Trial

We looked at the effectiveness of systematic biopsy (usually 12 cores taken from the prostate gland) and targeted biopsy (cores from a suspicious area seen on a scan) of the prostate among men aged 45-54 years as part of a prostate cancer screening trial. The results show that using only two targeted cores per lesion seen on an MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) scan may miss a significant number of clinically relevant prostate cancers. One reason could be that MRI-targeted biopsies are not always perfectly accurate. To improve diagnostic accuracy in younger men, it may be necessary to take additional systematic tissue samples, or at least more samples from around any suspicious area. This trial is registered on ISRCTN as ISRCTN37591328.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Urology Oncology
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.10.014
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Value of Additional Systematic Cores During Magnetic Resonance Imaging–guided Targeted Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Screening for Young Men: Results from the PROBASE Trial

Christian Arsov, Matthias Boschheidgen, Glen Kristiansen, Rouvier Al‐Monajjed et al.
European Urology Oncology
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Value of Additional Systematic Cores During Magnetic Resonance Imaging–guided Targeted Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Screening for Young Men: Results from the PROBASE Trial

Christian Arsov, Matthias Boschheidgen, Glen Kristiansen, Rouvier Al‐Monajjed, Daniel Düx, David Bonekamp, Kathleen Herkommer, Jale Lakes, Axel Benner, Agnė Krilavičiūtė, Rudolf Kaaks, Frank Wacker, Gerald Antoch, Matthias Jahnen, Andreas Sauter, Jürgen E. Gschwend, Petra Seibold, Boris Hadaschik, Nina N. Harke, Lars Schimmöller, Christoph A. Fink, Jürgen Debus, Markus Antonius Kuczyk, Nikolaus Becker, Frederik Lars Giesel, Jan-Philipp Radtke, H Schlemmer, Marcus R. Makowski
article en

Abstract

We looked at the effectiveness of systematic biopsy (usually 12 cores taken from the prostate gland) and targeted biopsy (cores from a suspicious area seen on a scan) of the prostate among men aged 45-54 years as part of a prostate cancer screening trial. The results show that using only two targeted cores per lesion seen on an MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) scan may miss a significant number of clinically relevant prostate cancers. One reason could be that MRI-targeted biopsies are not always perfectly accurate. To improve diagnostic accuracy in younger men, it may be necessary to take additional systematic tissue samples, or at least more samples from around any suspicious area. This trial is registered on ISRCTN as ISRCTN37591328.

European Urology Oncology
German Cancer Research Center (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Bonn (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), TUM Klinikum (DE), Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE), Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE), Marien Hospital Düsseldorf (DE), Städtische Kliniken Mönchengladbach (DE), Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DE), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Deutsche Krebshilfe
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.