Is Second Metatarsal Shortening Osteotomy Necessary With Concomitant First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis? A Case-Control Study

First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis is a common surgical intervention for end-stage hallux rigidus and valgus. Such cases can be complicated by disruptions in the metatarsal parabola, particularly an elongated second metatarsal. Some experts advocate for a shortening osteotomy of long metatarsals to restore forefoot balance. However, the present investigators question the benefit of second metatarsal shortening procedures when the first metatarsal is effectively lengthened with arthrodesis. Thus, the current study sought to compare first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis with and without second metatarsal shortening osteotomy. After study criteria, 24 patients undergoing first MTPJ arthrodesis with adjacent Weil osteotomy were matched to 48 patients who underwent first MTPJ arthrodesis alone. Patients were matched for age, sex, indication (hallux rigidus or hallux valgus), metatarsal parabola, body-mass index (BMI), laterality, bone supplementation, fixation type (interfragmentary screw and dorsal locking plate), diabetes, tobacco use, and inflammatory arthropathies. No significant demographic differences were found between the groups (P > .1). At the mean follow-up of 25.5 months, the Weil osteotomy group had twice as many reoperations compared with the control group, at a rate of 25 and 6.3%, respectively (P = .053; OR: 4.9; CI: 1.1-21.7). There were 4 nonunions in each group, with nonunion rates of 16% in the Weil osteotomy group versus 8.3% in the arthrodesis-alone group (P = .43; OR: 2.15; CI: 0.49-9.5). Subsecond metatarsal pain was observed in 16.7% of the Weil osteotomy group (n = 4) and 6.3% of the control group (p= 0.23, OR: 2.8; CI: 0.57-13.6). In this first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis series, no benefit was found when an adjacent second metatarsal shortening osteotomy was completed for preoperative metatarsalgia. Further research is needed to determine if such osteotomies benefit patients undergoing first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis.<b>Levels of Evidence:</b> <i>III</i>.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foot & Ankle Specialist
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400251382149
Primary Topic
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Second Metatarsal Shortening Osteotomy Necessary With Concomitant First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis? A Case-Control Study

Ramez Sakkab, Jeffrey E. McAlister, Michael Radcliffe, Luís Bustos et al.
Foot & Ankle Specialist
Foot and Ankle Surgery
article

Is Second Metatarsal Shortening Osteotomy Necessary With Concomitant First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis? A Case-Control Study

Ramez Sakkab, Jeffrey E. McAlister, Michael Radcliffe, Luís Bustos, Zachary Flynn
article en

Abstract

First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis is a common surgical intervention for end-stage hallux rigidus and valgus. Such cases can be complicated by disruptions in the metatarsal parabola, particularly an elongated second metatarsal. Some experts advocate for a shortening osteotomy of long metatarsals to restore forefoot balance. However, the present investigators question the benefit of second metatarsal shortening procedures when the first metatarsal is effectively lengthened with arthrodesis. Thus, the current study sought to compare first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis with and without second metatarsal shortening osteotomy. After study criteria, 24 patients undergoing first MTPJ arthrodesis with adjacent Weil osteotomy were matched to 48 patients who underwent first MTPJ arthrodesis alone. Patients were matched for age, sex, indication (hallux rigidus or hallux valgus), metatarsal parabola, body-mass index (BMI), laterality, bone supplementation, fixation type (interfragmentary screw and dorsal locking plate), diabetes, tobacco use, and inflammatory arthropathies. No significant demographic differences were found between the groups (P > .1). At the mean follow-up of 25.5 months, the Weil osteotomy group had twice as many reoperations compared with the control group, at a rate of 25 and 6.3%, respectively (P = .053; OR: 4.9; CI: 1.1-21.7). There were 4 nonunions in each group, with nonunion rates of 16% in the Weil osteotomy group versus 8.3% in the arthrodesis-alone group (P = .43; OR: 2.15; CI: 0.49-9.5). Subsecond metatarsal pain was observed in 16.7% of the Weil osteotomy group (n = 4) and 6.3% of the control group (p= 0.23, OR: 2.8; CI: 0.57-13.6). In this first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis series, no benefit was found when an adjacent second metatarsal shortening osteotomy was completed for preoperative metatarsalgia. Further research is needed to determine if such osteotomies benefit patients undergoing first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis.<b>Levels of Evidence:</b> <i>III</i>.

Foot & Ankle Specialist
Sutter Medical Center (US), Arizona Science Center (US), Kaiser Permanente South Sacramento Medical Center (US), Sutter Auburn Faith Hospital (US), Kaiser Permanente Sacramento Medical Center (US), Scottsdale Research Institute (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Foot and Ankle Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.