The Power of Technical Language: Does Jargon Use Influence the Credibility of Misinformation?

ABSTRACT Across two studies, we examined the impact of different levels of jargon on the perceived credibility of texts containing reliable or unreliable information. Study 1 found that higher levels of jargon were associated with increased credibility ratings for unreliable texts. Study 2 showed that higher levels of jargon were also associated with lower processing fluency for both reliable and unreliable texts. Additionally, the high level of jargon was associated with higher credibility ratings compared to text containing no jargon, and those high in conspiracy mentality were more influenced by the amount of jargon when making their credibility ratings. Jargon had a direct effect on increasing credibility, but also indirectly decreased credibility through a decrease in processing fluency. Together, these findings suggest that the presence of technical terms enhances the credibility of even unreliable text, and that individuals with conspiracy mentality leanings are more susceptible to this influence of jargon.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.70137
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Power of Technical Language: Does Jargon Use Influence the Credibility of Misinformation?

Jyotsna Vaid, Tanisha Y. Berrios, Dun‐Ya Hu
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

The Power of Technical Language: Does Jargon Use Influence the Credibility of Misinformation?

Jyotsna Vaid, Tanisha Y. Berrios, Dun‐Ya Hu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Across two studies, we examined the impact of different levels of jargon on the perceived credibility of texts containing reliable or unreliable information. Study 1 found that higher levels of jargon were associated with increased credibility ratings for unreliable texts. Study 2 showed that higher levels of jargon were also associated with lower processing fluency for both reliable and unreliable texts. Additionally, the high level of jargon was associated with higher credibility ratings compared to text containing no jargon, and those high in conspiracy mentality were more influenced by the amount of jargon when making their credibility ratings. Jargon had a direct effect on increasing credibility, but also indirectly decreased credibility through a decrease in processing fluency. Together, these findings suggest that the presence of technical terms enhances the credibility of even unreliable text, and that individuals with conspiracy mentality leanings are more susceptible to this influence of jargon.

Applied Cognitive PsychologyVol. 39(6)
Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.