Comparative Outcomes of Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy After Radical Cystectomy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Purpose: Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) improves survival after radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), and adjuvant immunotherapy with nivolumab has shown beneficial effects. However, direct comparisons between these treatments in clinical practice are limited. This study evaluated the real-world outcomes of patients who received no adjuvant therapy, AC, or adjuvant immunotherapy after RC. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study included 528 patients who underwent RC at Osaka University and its affiliated hospitals between 2010 and 2024. The patients were categorized into 3 groups: no adjuvant therapy, AC, and adjuvant immunotherapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to minimize selection bias. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate disease-free and cancer-specific survival. Results: Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 16.6, 22.3, and 26.4 months in the no-adjuvant therapy, AC, and adjuvant immunotherapy groups, respectively. Both adjuvant treatments significantly improved disease-free and cancer-specific survival in lymph node-positive patients. Multivariate analysis confirmed that AC ( P < .001) and immunotherapy ( P = .030) were independent prognostic factors for DFS. After PSM, adjuvant immunotherapy showed significantly improved disease-free ( P = .002) and cancer-specific survival ( P = .004) compared with no adjuvant therapy. No significant differences in survival outcomes were observed between AC and adjuvant immunotherapy groups. Conclusion: Adjuvant immunotherapy is an effective alternative to chemotherapy after RC, particularly in lymph node-positive patients. These findings support the use of immunotherapy as a postoperative treatment strategy for MIBC. Further research is needed to refine the optimal adjuvant treatment approaches.
Authors
- Kosuke Nakano (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5356-7359)
- Yoshiyuki Yamamoto (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1271-3521)
- Masao Kobayashi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8442-7879)
- Koji Hatano (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8409-5152)
- Atsunari Kawashima (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9369-4264)
- Kyosuke Matsuzaki (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7137-1162)
- Yu Ishizuya (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0778-1308)
- Takuji Hayashi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2030-3087)
- Toshichika Iwanishi
- Takahiro Yoshida (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9468-7453)
- Syunsuke Inoguchi
- Noriko Minato
- Norio Nonomura (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6522-6233)
- Akira Nagahara (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6956-2189)
- Osamu Miyake
- Makoto Matsushita (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7491-9410)
- Tsuyoshi Takada
- Masao Tsujihata
- Taigo Kato
- Hirokazu Osaki
Institutions
- Osaka Prefecture University (JP)
- Osaka Prefectural Medical Center (JP)
- Osaka City University (JP)
- Toyonaka Municipal Hospital (JP)
- Osaka National Hospital (JP)
- Osaka City General Hospital (JP)
- Osaka International Cancer Institute (JP)
- Ikeda Municipal Hospital (JP)
- Sakai Municipal Hospital (JP)
- Osaka Rosai Hospital (JP)
- Higashi Osaka City General Hospital (JP)
- Osaka Hospital (JP)
- Nippon Medical School Hospital (JP)
- Hyogo Prefectural Nishinomiya Hospital (JP)
- Minoh City Hospital (JP)
- Osaka City University Hospital (JP)
- The University of Osaka (JP)
Publication Details
- Journal
- JU Open Plus
- Published
- 2025-11-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ju9.0000000000000377
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.01