Image Reconstruction in Compressive Sensing Using the Level 3 Reverse Biorthogonal 4.4 (rbio4.4) Discrete Wavelet Transform and SP, CoSaMP and ALISTA Algorithm

This paper presents an efficient image reconstruction method based on Compressive Sensing (CS) theory, leveraging the level-3 Reverse Biorthogonal 4.4 (rbio4.4) discrete wavelet transform in combination with three reconstruction algorithms: Subspace Pursuit (SP), Compressive Sampling Matched Pursuit (CoSaMP), and the Analytic Learned Iterative Shrinkage Thresholding Algorithm (ALISTA). The approach exploits the sparsity of images in a suitable wavelet basis, enabling compressed acquisition from a reduced number of random linear measurements. The process consists of four stages: (1) decomposition of the original image using the rbio4.4 wavelet transform to obtain sparse coefficients, (2) compressed sampling via a random measurement matrix, (3) reconstruction of the sparse signal using SP, CoSaMP, or ALISTA, and (4) final image reconstruction through the inverse wavelet transform. Experimental evaluation was conducted on the classic Lena image (200 × 200 pixels), comparing the three algorithms in terms of reconstruction quality measured by the Structural Similarity Index (SSIM) and computational cost (reconstruction time in minutes) across sampling rates ranging from 10% to 60%. Results show that all three algorithms achieve nearly identical reconstruction quality (virtually indistinguishable SSIM values at each sampling rate), confirming their effectiveness within the CS. However, ALISTA stands out significantly due to its exceptional speed, exhibiting substantially lower reconstruction times thanks to its learned nature, which replaces iterative procedures with fixed, optimized operations. In contrast, CoSaMP demonstrates higher and sometimes unpredictable computational times depending on the sampling rate. These findings highlight ALISTA’s strong potential for real-time or embedded applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Journal of Circuits Systems and Signal Processing
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cssp.20251201.12
Primary Topic
Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Image Reconstruction in Compressive Sensing Using the Level 3 Reverse Biorthogonal 4.4 (rbio4.4) Discrete Wavelet Transform and SP, CoSaMP and ALISTA Algorithm

Hariony Rakotonirina, Sarobidy Luc, Marie Randrianandrasana
Science Journal of Circuits Systems and Signal Processing
Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
article

Image Reconstruction in Compressive Sensing Using the Level 3 Reverse Biorthogonal 4.4 (rbio4.4) Discrete Wavelet Transform and SP, CoSaMP and ALISTA Algorithm

Hariony Rakotonirina, Sarobidy Luc, Marie Randrianandrasana
article en

Abstract

This paper presents an efficient image reconstruction method based on Compressive Sensing (CS) theory, leveraging the level-3 Reverse Biorthogonal 4.4 (rbio4.4) discrete wavelet transform in combination with three reconstruction algorithms: Subspace Pursuit (SP), Compressive Sampling Matched Pursuit (CoSaMP), and the Analytic Learned Iterative Shrinkage Thresholding Algorithm (ALISTA). The approach exploits the sparsity of images in a suitable wavelet basis, enabling compressed acquisition from a reduced number of random linear measurements. The process consists of four stages: (1) decomposition of the original image using the rbio4.4 wavelet transform to obtain sparse coefficients, (2) compressed sampling via a random measurement matrix, (3) reconstruction of the sparse signal using SP, CoSaMP, or ALISTA, and (4) final image reconstruction through the inverse wavelet transform. Experimental evaluation was conducted on the classic Lena image (200 × 200 pixels), comparing the three algorithms in terms of reconstruction quality measured by the Structural Similarity Index (SSIM) and computational cost (reconstruction time in minutes) across sampling rates ranging from 10% to 60%. Results show that all three algorithms achieve nearly identical reconstruction quality (virtually indistinguishable SSIM values at each sampling rate), confirming their effectiveness within the CS. However, ALISTA stands out significantly due to its exceptional speed, exhibiting substantially lower reconstruction times thanks to its learned nature, which replaces iterative procedures with fixed, optimized operations. In contrast, CoSaMP demonstrates higher and sometimes unpredictable computational times depending on the sampling rate. These findings highlight ALISTA’s strong potential for real-time or embedded applications.

Science Journal of Circuits Systems and Signal ProcessingVol. 12(1)
University of Antananarivo (MG), Centre National de la Recherche Appliquée au Developpement Rural (MG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.