Science space: the evolution of scientific knowledge specialisations across European regions

Abstract This study extends evolutionary economic geography to science by mapping how regional scientific capabilities emerge and evolve across Europe. Using Web of Science publications (2000–2017) geo-coded to 1,216 regions in 35 countries and classified into 228 subjects, we construct a pan-European “Science Space” based on subject co-occurrence and relatedness, and test whether relatedness density, i.e., the embeddedness of a subject in a region’s existing portfolio, predicts subsequent entry (Revealed Scientific Advantage ≥ 1). Network evidence shows Europe’s science system becoming more interdisciplinary, with technology-adjacent subjects (e.g., nanoscience, robotics, computer science) gaining centrality, while Life Sciences & Biomedicine remain dominant by volume. Econometric results (pooled OLS and GLM for binary entry, with region/subject/period fixed effects and controls for the regional economy and knowledge base) indicate that higher relatedness density significantly raises the likelihood of scientific entry. The effect is stronger in non-metropolitan regions and when a subject’s initial RSA is very low, consistent with relatedness seeding new capabilities rather than merely consolidating near-threshold strengths. These findings generalise the principle of relatedness from technology to science and advise regional innovation policy to prioritise adjacent scientific opportunities, invest in bridging infrastructures, and design interdisciplinary platforms where relatedness density is high but specialisation has not yet emerged.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/zfw-2025-0058
Primary Topic
Economic and Technological Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Science space: the evolution of scientific knowledge specialisations across European regions

Dieter F. Kogler, Hyunha Shin, Keungoui Kim
ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography
Economic and Technological Innovation
article

Science space: the evolution of scientific knowledge specialisations across European regions

Dieter F. Kogler, Hyunha Shin, Keungoui Kim
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study extends evolutionary economic geography to science by mapping how regional scientific capabilities emerge and evolve across Europe. Using Web of Science publications (2000–2017) geo-coded to 1,216 regions in 35 countries and classified into 228 subjects, we construct a pan-European “Science Space” based on subject co-occurrence and relatedness, and test whether relatedness density, i.e., the embeddedness of a subject in a region’s existing portfolio, predicts subsequent entry (Revealed Scientific Advantage ≥ 1). Network evidence shows Europe’s science system becoming more interdisciplinary, with technology-adjacent subjects (e.g., nanoscience, robotics, computer science) gaining centrality, while Life Sciences & Biomedicine remain dominant by volume. Econometric results (pooled OLS and GLM for binary entry, with region/subject/period fixed effects and controls for the regional economy and knowledge base) indicate that higher relatedness density significantly raises the likelihood of scientific entry. The effect is stronger in non-metropolitan regions and when a subject’s initial RSA is very low, consistent with relatedness seeding new capabilities rather than merely consolidating near-threshold strengths. These findings generalise the principle of relatedness from technology to science and advise regional innovation policy to prioritise adjacent scientific opportunities, invest in bridging infrastructures, and design interdisciplinary platforms where relatedness density is high but specialisation has not yet emerged.

ZFW – Advances in Economic GeographyVol. 69(2-3)
University College Dublin (IE), Yonsei University (KR), Hodges University (US), Dublin City University (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Economic and Technological Innovation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.